Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 13 October 2017 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7971330AD for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sFWeUSW6QS2E for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A125413243A for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id l68so22858678wmd.5 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=he/auLsYxC/LD/vmDjaFhi+hf9vT4I2iGxUquM4htiE=; b=sa8lmwZnL2uYZfUb/ihYdNX7HdD+tGExtg9+ovK16zNQbIZj9l6MENzN28i20U2YP9 H0Ym3drC0fZj6HZfhMVXnFIIT4x490EzqSyagLDkUSkaRJ94k8KjVdcfU0gaH4u6sv1r wnGliq05724gAFEOamoG/9+H+Pisd0EgFtiUBf4Q5DlxULQCVWCwScXxYlQip44a5erJ knsnkGtpZFlwv50wwY1GI9sAvv2W7fF7qqAve0da+SH4V6v1X45r95nHj6Ds7+sMKsH4 EV4kOoTJ0afzFMgFhG5/IFE4JffIBTRuhfS0tQv850DZzdLEEP54bZlT9y/6SZ1Y/nc6 OCoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=he/auLsYxC/LD/vmDjaFhi+hf9vT4I2iGxUquM4htiE=; b=i7H/LP9lc9tyWU0WGYywuQpV/rrkaby/i6qlfvBf5/XbtJgqdj1qe5sNCqYPrxBb1M Wz7W/lGHV+iznUEdcjerbmB2/wRspdy3lCJC0mgwqEqRfc9BcFyFUPsKLWJW5kLsdU8d ioQy+Afc3r9qnfoI/25QKQ/uueKqjZKjoJJ090hVQC/9yNs87dYtDh593zUywXz2yDz8 WjDDBQaM0RJy4vjVb/xxqXR/VLfnDofjOypxPW9tDdJxJga1ekoW3LV3+qgdRbXSEE4E 1U1fQzxgvR8fZLHUZRidBPpBMbLUtKJR+8WD/2dfwHug1tUZcZHjZgPsUoz5/EdM1hNf 4uRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXfg2+GXiBDrxfMhWeXVbkyw3j9qBmpdxiFj6ejL1MgLAI3/bg7 lGLvjsosZmr1HL5LHgbehP579Bc2
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QA/mHIbZ8Jul6VTwyHA6/HXw09vlbF9URJi5pyX1gWZEkfH+VXX1/6dZu4o/8GQVHBl+hj2rA==
X-Received: by 10.80.176.225 with SMTP id j88mr2867562edd.25.1507912454764; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.40.209] (ip-80-113-11-227.ip.prioritytelecom.net. [80.113.11.227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x35sm1213487edx.17.2017.10.13.09.34.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15A403)
In-Reply-To: <ddd62ee8-5dce-89e4-5810-679c60a085e1@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 18:34:13 +0200
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <D3A806B5-42FC-4CDC-9792-79EDBAA685F0@gmail.com>
References: <88288A22-2EF7-4491-A93A-2181ADACF994@juniper.net> <ddd62ee8-5dce-89e4-5810-679c60a085e1@cisco.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/hDKeYG3PCXbR8H5J0WgPzLGEoos>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 16:34:19 -0000

Yes/support 

Jeff
>> On 13/10/2017 15:37, Kent Watsen wrote:
>> All,
>> 
>> Now that we have resolved the module naming issue on the list (i.e.
>> that keeps the original rfc module names and updates the unwanted
>> legacy nodes to have status 'obsolete'), rather than wait for the
>> changes to be made in the individual document, we'd like to move
>> ahead with the adoption now, with the understanding that these
>> changes will be made in the -01 version of the adopted draft.
>> 
>> This is start of a two-week poll on making draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03
>> a working group document.  Please send email to the list indicating
>> "yes/support" or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state
>> your reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to
>> provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG
>> document.
>> 
>> The poll ends Oct 27.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Kent (and Lou)
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>> .
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod