Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-02: (with COMMENT)

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Thu, 11 January 2018 09:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3322312EAC1; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 01:11:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mXcNIaqf0KaI; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 01:11:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B0B124239; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 01:11:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.56]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C5921AE00B6; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:11:25 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:11:24 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <20180111.101124.1945243507741650830.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: adam@nostrum.com
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <151565576445.10072.221877513960755879.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <151565576445.10072.221877513960755879.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/hJNiW5hp3dDDM_uv0ptNypSuMc8>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:11:28 -0000

Hi,

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>; wrote:
> Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-02: No Objection

[...]

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> The MAC addresses in the examples are using an OUI of 00:01:02, which is
> assigned by IEEE to 3Com (and which presumably belongs to HP now). Please
> change the examples to make use of addresses from the unicast range documented
> in <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7042#section-2.1.2>
> (e.g. 00:00:5E:00:53:AB).

Thank you for drawing my attention to this RFC; I did not know about it.

The MAC address is now fixed in my local copy.


/martin