IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] stable reference for tree diagram notation

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Mon, 13 March 2017 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5125B129481 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZrP18zyhGe-S for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.23.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D8B33129406 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 29729 invoked by uid 0); 13 Mar 2017 19:45:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2017 19:45:42 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id vXle1u00G2SSUrH01XlhFZ; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:45:41 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=R4+QR7hX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=6Iz7jQTuP9IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=AUd_NHdVAAAA:8 a=TtM8FXedt-gQiNVzpRsA:9 a=TAPHHp55TXsM_zhz:21 a=fzss5xWRLZ4kHxM5:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=Yz9wTY_ffGCQnEDHKrcv:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=TSZmLRzkpGLBZRr3r8m8:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:Cc:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=2UYQAm6nwaMUawC5eb0Kt6NRejDDe+j0lM+mhUzYI6Y=; b=g42Ht5Pee6bomdR76tLaRvgght l2wP8sPg0dQvmuXX5lCZsPaks8isaN9aCJUlbv2R8fF2Fz4VQPXC98UfoqP/73D8971b/A4sljELj XpIM+v/TmsTFZYCRkPZZ8IuDQ;
Received: from pool-100-15-85-191.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.85.191]:40332 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1cnVuU-00005W-0v; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:45:38 -0600
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
References: <271CED23-8655-45A8-8E05-3ABD460871BD@juniper.net> <20170308193434.GA10080@elstar.local> <D4E9D4E5.A12DC%acee@cisco.com> <20170311.224951.2245774412799352894.mbj@tail-f.com> <ff00c44b-e0f0-fb30-783f-a992e723da8d@cisco.com> <6fe6a732-ccda-a93d-f005-63ec25cebf60@labn.net> <CABCOCHTRsCZdJ5J2QAQoxQ0W3vH1hoJCQF0d26Hy1x-JmBcOUg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <55b700f1-576c-1544-7e9c-56799a08dcb3@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:45:36 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHTRsCZdJ5J2QAQoxQ0W3vH1hoJCQF0d26Hy1x-JmBcOUg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.85.191
X-Exim-ID: 1cnVuU-00005W-0v
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-85-191.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.85.191]:40332
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 8
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/hRTgwJT--tG2ZooJwM1GO5qa-8s>
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] stable reference for tree diagram notation
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 19:45:47 -0000

Andy,


On 3/13/2017 3:07 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net
> <mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote:
>
>     FYI - just slapped together and published:
>
>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-00
>     <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-00>
>
>     Lou
>
>     (as contributor)
>
>     PS I'm happy with the definition being in 6780bis or in a
>     standalone doc
>     (as above), but really think we as a WG need to decide ASAP so as
>     not to
>     hold up 6780bis any further...
>
>
>
>
> standalone doc is fine.
>
> does this mean the contents of the tree diagram and the syntax for the
> tree diagram are subject to WG consensus?
>

As contained in RFCs - I would think so. 

As available from tools -- This is for the tools author IMO.

Lou

>
> Andy
>  
>
>     On 3/13/2017 2:20 PM, Robert Wilton wrote:
>     > Hi Andy,
>     >
>     > Would it make sense to update 6087bis section 4.4 to reference
>     this new
>     > pyang option for generated tree diagrams?
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     > Rob
>     >
>     >
>     > On 11/03/2017 21:49, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>     >> "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com <mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
>     wrote:
>     >>> Hi Juergen,
>     >>>
>     >>> On 3/8/17, 2:34 PM, "netmod on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder"
>     >>> <netmod-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org> on
>     behalf of
>     >>> j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
>     <mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>> wrote:
>     >>>
>     >>>> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 06:56:20PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
>     >>>>> This way, reader can focus more quickly on the diffs, but
>     also this
>     >>>>> likely mimics what happened in reality (start with `pyang -f
>     tree`
>     >>>>> and then manually edit from there).  What do you think?
>     >>>>>
>     >>>> Manually edited tree diagrams? I hope not.
>     >>> I frequently have to manually edit the pyang-generated trees
>     to get them
>     >>> to fit in the xml2rfc output. Is there a work around for this
>     that I don¹t
>     >>> know about?
>     >> In the latest pyang, I have added --tree-line-length.  Use:
>     >>
>     >>    pyang -f -tree --tree-line-length 69 ...
>     >>
>     >> to fit RFCs.
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> /martin
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> netmod mailing list
>     >> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
>     >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>
>     >> .
>     >>
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > netmod mailing list
>     > netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
>     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>
>     >
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email