Re: [netmod] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08.txt

"Hejia (Jia)" <hejia@huawei.com> Fri, 19 January 2018 01:03 UTC

Return-Path: <hejia@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26B812D77E; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:03:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u_GV7ltqfbYp; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:03:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6F3412D775; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:03:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id D8BF09522D733; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 01:03:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMA401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.42) by LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 01:03:11 +0000
Received: from DGGEMA503-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.5]) by DGGEMA401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.42]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 09:02:56 +0800
From: "Hejia (Jia)" <hejia@huawei.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
CC: "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis.all@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08.txt
Thread-Index: AdOQwL3kLsyOwxG8RviHeGXe7RKfjA==
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 01:02:55 +0000
Message-ID: <735916399E11684EAF4EB4FB376B719553034BDD@DGGEMA503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.57.113.123]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/hizZMbriGUT0zDOeUVPMqgE2YWA>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08.txt
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 01:03:16 -0000

Acee,

Thanks for considering my comment. I'm OK with the new version.


B.R.
Jia



-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com] 
发送时间: 2018年1月18日 0:03
收件人: Hejia (Jia) <hejia@huawei.com>; rtg-ads@ietf.org
抄送: rtg-dir@ietf.org; draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis.all@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
主题: Re: Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08.txt

Hi Jia, 

Thanks for your review. The Appendix D nit has been fixed in the -09 version  (the only change).

Thanks,
Acee

On 1/17/18, 1:50 AM, "Hejia (Jia)" <hejia@huawei.com> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft.
>The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related 
>drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and 
>sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide 
>assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing 
>Directorate, please see 
>http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir
>
>Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, 
>it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other 
>IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them 
>through discussion or by updating the draft.
>
>Document draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08.txt
>Reviewer: Jia He
>Review Date: 17 January 2018
>IETF LC End Date: 15 January 2018
>Telechat date: 25 January 2018
>Intended Status: Standards Track
>
>Summary
>This document provides an NMDA-compliant version of YANG data model for 
>routing management. It is very well written and ready for publication.
>But I happened to see a small nit in Appendix D just before I finished 
>my review, see below.
>
>Comments
>None.
>
>Major Issues:
>No major issues found.
>
>Minor Issues:
>No minor issues found.
>
>Nits:
>In Appendix D, the namespace of "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing" is written 
>as "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing-3". "-3" is 
>not meaningful and needs to be deleted.
>
>
>
>Regards,
>Jia