Re: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-09: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 25 January 2018 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A712512D94E; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:48:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vPLM0OO7SukH; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:48:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 502CA12D95C; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:48:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2818; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1516898891; x=1518108491; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=89oVeugcejmJ4VltxWbTnxmys2DcI9Dj2F501QGCd8c=; b=Dzh+q3kPO7pdrtHsSp3B6JwYEcqogPQhDa/lXw9gsAp2knxpuoBmZs4+ Wb9xy9s1cQPYyxgRSUyzI8xvVgCnYaHXecx1FlXKZW2eWvlvSIMJaWIO2 n1YOUhtppT248YJ9RCR4Rs2E04M4YveZTdMHOmm0p99X8H5nGRHNiojyS g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CcAgDJCWpa/40NJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNCZnQnB4NWmQ2ZWoICCiOFGAIagX5YFAEBAQEBAQEBAmsohSQGIxFFEAIBCBoCJgICAjAVEAIEAQ0FijUQtGOCJ4pSAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWBD4NCghWDPymDBYMvAgEBAQGBOgESAR+DFzGCNAWKYJkqAogTjU2CG4Yfi2uKfIJgiVECERkBgTsBNiJgVxEIcBVnAYF/gwmBTngBi32BJYEXAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,412,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="347803152"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jan 2018 16:48:06 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (xch-rtp-014.cisco.com [64.101.220.154]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w0PGm6QT024897 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:48:06 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (64.101.220.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:48:05 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:48:05 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis@ietf.org>, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-09: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTlSoaR8T/HlwVzUmTGPRq8EWYVKOEzjUA
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:48:05 +0000
Message-ID: <D44907C8-CA13-44DC-B2E7-2B5F956A7737@cisco.com>
References: <151680861581.25648.8503007790939454483.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151680861581.25648.8503007790939454483.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B93E4BDA0D80AD4D9108D6060C1621AA@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/iErI8TuQOVcCxF_ek-z3clz9MSQ>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:48:14 -0000

Hi Suresh, 

Thanks for the review - see inline. 

On 1/24/18, 10:43 AM, "Suresh Krishnan" <suresh@kaloom.com> wrote:

    Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-09: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    * Lots of places in the document where NMDA is misspelled as NDMA. Please fix.

I'm hardwired to type "N-D" - you can take the boy out of North Dakota but you can't the North Dakota out of the boy... I've fixed all these. 


    
    * Section 9.1.
    
    The ranges for AdvDefaultLifetime and MaxRtrAdvInterval have been changed by
    RFC-to-be-8319 to update the values specified in RFC4861.  Please change these
    ranges to the new values.
    
    OLD:
    
    leaf max-rtr-adv-interval {
               type uint16 {
                 range "4..1800";
               }
    
    NEW:
    
    leaf max-rtr-adv-interval {
               type uint16 {
                 range "4..65535";
               }
    
    OLD:
    
             leaf default-lifetime {
               type uint16 {
                 range "0..9000";
               }
    
    NEW:
             leaf default-lifetime {
               type uint16 {
                 range "0..65535";
               }
    
    Good point, these changes will be in th -10 version. 

Thanks,
Acee