[netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Thu, 07 November 2024 08:42 UTC
Return-Path: <0100019305c9b5d1-f84cbf3c-c678-433a-ae0a-1f7e686d30b2-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0625BC18870B for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 00:42:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bb9Z5C07Qcc3 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 00:42:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a48-94.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-94.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.94]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2FC9C1840E7 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 00:42:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1730968925; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:Message-Id:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:Feedback-ID; bh=A7dno5n51/CbhTjyOwWmjQAaysbX935tLmtlDlxQPos=; b=p+nFPErm5mvurbIIjMTVc0zFol6zq60eDIXSE+Np9KfNlziiWdXdHCfiUfC9TQ3D 7ePlbgWQRiJOBxQ6/pyFsoZZewrV571ePqGMDNmnvP5cOVpSUppbF43CRAMea4qeeNC 7oGpo5oFEzfdpMINc54bxTP+V3TCFqolZBVEJ80M=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:42:05 +0000
Message-ID: <0100019305c9b5d1-f84cbf3c-c678-433a-ae0a-1f7e686d30b2-000000@email.amazonses.com>
References: <DU2PR02MB10160EEC672998623F899175A885C2@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DU2PR02MB10160EEC672998623F899175A885C2@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (22A3370)
Feedback-ID: ::1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2024.11.07-54.240.48.94
Message-ID-Hash: 5RR4YFWVMILWJNPSEJ7RCJEMCBKQ2OXT
X-Message-ID-Hash: 5RR4YFWVMILWJNPSEJ7RCJEMCBKQ2OXT
X-MailFrom: 0100019305c9b5d1-f84cbf3c-c678-433a-ae0a-1f7e686d30b2-000000@amazonses.watsen.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netmod.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>, Italo Busi <Italo.Busi=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Jürgen Schönwälder <jschoenwaelder@constructor.university>, Jan Lindblad <jlindbla@cisco.com>, netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/idrHq1FciYDhQTbl-T2FIdyAdR0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netmod-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netmod-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netmod-leave@ietf.org>
I wrote a lot of scripts to autogenerate the client-server suite of drafts, including some to cherry-pick sub tree-diagrams. I once quipped with Juergen that drafts that are primarily used to publish YANG modules were so mechanical, that a possible student project could be to write a tool called “yang2rfc”. Such a tool would take as input, e.g., an ordered list of cherry-picking-xpaths, and pre/post-text for each. Obviously there would be more input (e.g., an ordered list of YANG modules and text for each), but you get the idea. My scripts were simple/hacky ‘bash’ but I would use Python (using Lada’s wonderful Yangson library) for a generic tool. I would love to write ‘yang2rfc’, but it would entail me volunteering free time I don’t have ;) Kent // contributor > On Nov 7, 2024, at 6:22 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote: > > Hi Italo, > > Agree. > > I don't know which tool Jürgen was referring to, but I'm aware of --tree-depth and --tree-path options in pyang (mentioned in the tree RFC, btw). > > Cheers, > Med > > > Orange Restricted > >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com> >> Envoyé : mercredi 6 novembre 2024 13:03 >> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>; >> Italo Busi <Italo.Busi=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; Jürgen >> Schönwälder <jschoenwaelder@constructor.university>; Lou Berger >> <lberger@labn.net> >> Cc : Jan Lindblad <jlindbla@cisco.com>; netmod@ietf.org >> Objet : RE: [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis >> >> >> Hi Med, >> >> IMHO, only the YANG code should be authoritative: the YANG tree >> should only be informative to help the readers. >> >> I see some pressure to IETF community to speed up the standard >> process to deliver YANG models. IMHO, reducing the workloads to >> the authors would help in this direction. >> >> What is the value of having tools if their output needs to be >> manually fixed? >> >> Jurgen mentioned a tool that can automatically brake down >> diagrams: having this tool available to the whole community would >> be great >> >> Italo >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com >> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> >>> Sent: mercoledì 6 novembre 2024 07:55 >>> To: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; Jürgen >> Schönwälder >>> <jschoenwaelder@constructor.university>; Lou Berger >> <lberger@labn.net> >>> Cc: Jan Lindblad <jlindbla@cisco.com>; netmod@ietf.org >>> Subject: [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis >>> >>> Hi Italo, >>> >>> The guidance is actually building on existing ones in Section 3 >> of [RFC8340] >>> (with one qualification about on where to put long trees). >>> >>> One of the reasons I expanded the text rather than simple >> pointer to Section 3 >>> of [RFC8340], is to have a self contained section for the >> authors where to look. >>> >>> BTW, pyang output is not authoritative and I encourage to >> review it. For >>> example, pyang output for groupings with lists is broken! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Med >>> >>>> -----Message d'origine----- >>>> De : Italo Busi <Italo.Busi=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> >>>> Envoyé : mardi 5 novembre 2024 13:25 >>>> À : Jürgen Schönwälder >> <jschoenwaelder@constructor.university>; >>>> Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> >>>> Cc : Jan Lindblad <jlindbla@cisco.com>; netmod@ietf.org >>>> Objet : [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis >>>> >>>> >>>> By reading the current text in section 3.4, I am getting a >> bit >>>> worried that we are increasing the workload of the editors of >> the >>>> YANG models drafts >>>> >>>> While I fully agree with the initial statement, "YANG tree >>>> diagrams provide a concise representation of a YANG module >> and >>>> SHOULD be included to help readers understand YANG module >>>> structure", I am wondering whether authors need to do more >> than >>>> just copying the tree generated by pyang >>>> >>>> For example, splitting the output of pyang into smaller >> diagrams >>>> requires editorial efforts and need to be re-done every time >> the >>>> YANG model is updated during the draft development >>>> >>>> In some of the draft I have worked on, I have included some >> YANG >>>> tree snapshots but regretted this because they quickly tend >> to >>>> get out of synch during the draft development >>>> >>>> What would be the drawback to always require the full data >> tree >>>> to be included into an Appendix, without introducing >> different >>>> cases? >>>> >>>> Italo >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Jürgen Schönwälder >>>> <jschoenwaelder@constructor.university> >>>>> Sent: martedì 5 novembre 2024 13:21 >>>>> To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> >>>>> Cc: Jan Lindblad <jlindbla@cisco.com>; netmod@ietf.org >>>>> Subject: [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis >>>>> >>>>> Since RFCs nowadays came in multiple formats, we do not >> know >>>> anymore for >>>>> sure what a page is. The text and html renderings do not >> seem >>>> to be paginated >>>>> anymore, the pdf rendering still seems to have pages. The >>>> canonical format >>>>> seems to be the xml file, which has no pagination either. >>>>> >>>>> We should rely on good judgment of the authors, a SHOULD >> NOT >>>> rule looks >>>>> like bureaucracy winning over trust into authors to make >>>> appropriate choices. >>>>> >>>>> /js >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 10:28:10AM +0000, Lou Berger wrote: >>>>>> Med >>>>>> >>>>>> See inline >>>>>> On 10/29/2024 8:20 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com >> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Re-, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The new guidance: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * characterizes what is long/too long tree >>>>>>> >>>>>> In yesterday's session you also mentioned that rfc8340 >> didn't >>>> define >>>>>> what a long/large tree is. I think you must have missed >> it >>>> in section >>>>>> 3.3 of RFC >>>>>> 8340: YANG Tree Diagrams >>>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F% >>>> 2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Frfc%2Frfc8340%23section- >>>> >>> 3.3&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166a >>> e4 >>>> >>> 9a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0% >>> 7C >>>> >>> 638664100806701855%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwM >>> DAiLC >>>> >>> >> JQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=J >>>> FhcfQiC3ypjhvrJOUO61Ige%2FOKAUEeQai3j4CISU90%3D&reserved=0> : >>>>>> >>>>>> As tree diagrams are intended to provide a simplified >>>>>> view of a module, diagrams longer than a page should >>>> generally be >>>>>> avoided. >>>>>> >>>>>> Isn't this sufficient. >>>>>> >>>>>>> * recommends against including too long trees in the >> main >>>> doc, while >>>>>>> Section 3 of RFC8340has the following: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When long diagrams are included in a document, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> authors should consider whether to include the long >> diagram >>>> in the >>>>>>> >>>>>>> main body of the document or in an appendix. >>>>>>> >>>>>> so want to change the existing non-RFC2119 formulation >>>> "should .. include .. >>>>>> in an appendix" to "SHOULD NOT include in the main body >> of >>>> the >>>>>> document", is this correct? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Lou >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Med >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *De :* Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> *Envoyé :* mardi >> 29 >>>> octobre >>>>>>> 2024 12:34 *À :* BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET >>>>>>> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>; Lou Berger >>>> <lberger@labn.net>; >>>>>>> netmod@ietf.org *Cc :* Jan Lindblad >> <jlindbla@cisco.com> >>>> *Objet :* >>>>>>> RE: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Med >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for this. The new doc says: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> These guidelines take precedence over the generic >>>> guidance in >>>>>>>> Section 3 of [RFC8340]. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you highlight what you see is the differences >> between >>>> the new >>>>>>> section and rfc8340? (In other words, why is a >> reference >>>> saying >>>>>>> authors should follow section 3.3 of rfc8340 >> insufficient?) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Lou >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- >>>> --------- >>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On October 29, 2024 4:25:44 AM >> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Lou, all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (1) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are RFCs that don’t include the full tree, >> but >>>> AFAIK there >>>>>>> is no RFCs that include a stable pointer for a >> tree. >>>> There are >>>>>>> I-Ds under development that follow that option, but >> I >>>> don’t think >>>>>>> this can be used as example as these are following >> what >>>> was in >>>>>>> rfc8407bis. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (2) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I paused to reply with the hope to hear more voices >>>> about this >>>>>>> issue. Till now, no one else indicated preference >> for >>>> the stable >>>>>>> URL option. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> With that, I prepared a PR to remove that option >> and >>>> only leave >>>>>>> the appendix option. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The full diff can be seen at: >>>>>>> >>>> >> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 >>>> Fauthor- >>>> tools.ietf.org%2Fapi%2Fiddiff%3Furl_1%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fnetmod- >>>> >>> &data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae4 >>> 9a2 >>>> >>> ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6 >>> 38 >>>> >>> 664100806730122%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAi >>> LCJQI >>>> >>> >> joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Hxg >>> Z >>>> jVYygwcP8VWH9I68YvHccEe8Z6huwBlKFqrSrV8%3D&reserved=0 >>>>> wg.github.io/rfc8407bis/draft-ietf-netmod- >>>>> >>>> >> rfc8407bis.txt&url_2=https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.c >> om/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.c%2F&dat >> a=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C2e2ccd3b7ca947d5ff73 >> 08dcfe65721f%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6386649 >> 58911869785%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV >> 2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5H%2FCcG >> PskipFgPgEKuNW2XsgNm9dhMY90ShfhLq%2Bbek%3D&reserved=0 >>>> om/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnetmod-wg.github.io%2Frfc8407bis%2Ftoo- >>>> long-trees- >>>> >>> &data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae4 >>> 9a2 >>>> >>> ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6 >>> 38 >>>> >>> 664100806745673%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAi >>> LCJQI >>>> >>> >> joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8GCj >>>> %2FKulj36AMYl%2Bca%2BmKxpLvrS42PaCjRwSdCZCNo4%3D&reserved=0 >>>>> bis/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis.txt >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F% >>>> 2Fauthor- >>>> tools.ietf.org%2Fapi%2Fiddiff%3Furl_1%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fnetmod- >>>> >>> wg.gi&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cc4a8f5a16 >>> 6a >>>> >>> e49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C >>> 0% >>>> >>> 7C638664100806761930%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjA >>> wMDAi >>>> >>> >> LCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata >>>> =6OjfnJAsoqVbAzqtvEUN93UyruW5essv7FQkEs%2FLvX0%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>> thub.io/rfc8407bis/draft-ietf-netmod- >>>> rfc8407bis.txt&url_2=https://ne >>>>>>> tmod-wg.github.io/rfc8407bis/too-long-trees-bis/draft- >> ietf- >>>> netmod-rf >>>>>>> c8407bis.txt> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hope this captures the opinions heard so far. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Med >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *De :*Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> >>>>>>> *Envoyé :* mardi 22 octobre 2024 17:29 >>>>>>> *À :* BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET >>>>> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>; >>>>>>> Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>; Andy Bierman >>>> <andy@yumaworks.com> >>>>>>> *Cc :* Mahesh Jethanandani >> <mjethanandani@gmail.com>; >>>>>>> netmod@ietf.org; draft-ietf-netmod- >> rfc8407bis@ietf.org; >>>> Jan >>>>>>> Lindblad <jlindbla@cisco.com>; Kent Watsen >>>> <kent+ietf@watsen.net> >>>>>>> *Objet :* RE: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod- >>>> rfc8407bis >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Med, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ---------- >>>>>>> On October 22, 2024 8:22:47 AM >>>> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Re-, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can you please indicate why you think this is a >> bad >>>> option? What >>>>>>> is the harm in recording an option that matches >> current >>>> practice? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there an example of a published rfc that points >> to >>>> the full >>>>>>> tree via a URL? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As far as I read the discussion, no one was >> agreeing >>>> that this >>>>>>> approach was a good idea. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Lou >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I remember that you indicated that you are using >> an >>>> electronic >>>>>>> device to read docs. You can still browse the tree >> from >>>> the >>>>>>> supplied URL. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Med >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> De : Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> >>>>>>>> Envoyé : mardi 22 octobre 2024 14:00 >>>>>>>> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET >>>>> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>; >>>>>>> Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>; Andy Bierman >>>> <andy@yumaworks.com> >>>>>>>> Cc : Mahesh Jethanandani >> <mjethanandani@gmail.com>; >>>>>>> netmod@ietf.org; draft-ietf-netmod- >> rfc8407bis@ietf.org; >>>> Jan >>>>>>> Lindblad <jlindbla@cisco.com>; Kent Watsen >>>> <kent+ietf@watsen.net> >>>>>>>> Objet : RE: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod- >>>> rfc8407bis >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Med, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ---------- >>>>>>>> On October 22, 2024 1:21:31 AM >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@ >>>>> orange.com>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Lou, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kent rightfully raised the point about the >> troubles >>>> with long >>>>>>> trees that exceeds the max line thing. I also >> clarified >>>> that, e.g., >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is separate and unrelated topic, talking >> about >>>> inclusion of >>>>>>> full trees in appendices as is currenty allowed for >> in >>>> rfc8340. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * Existing specs have provisions for tree >>>> diagrams to be >>>>>>> included “as a whole, by one or more sections, or >> even >>>> by subsets >>>>>>> of nodes” (8340) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes I'm familiar with that text :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * There are RFCs out there that do not >> include >>>> them. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sure, which is also allowed for in rfc8340 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is a MAY after all. We can't mandate that >> every >>>> doc MUST >>>>>>> include the full tree anyway. Are you asking for >> that? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Absolutely not. I'm not quite sure what give you >> that >>>>>>> impression. I just would like to see the additional >>>> option removed >>>>>>> as I think it is a bad idea. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Lou >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Med >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- >>>>>>>>>> De : Lou Berger >>>> <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net >>>>>>> >> <mailto:lberger@labn.net%3cmailto:lberger@labn.net>>> >>>>>>>>>> Envoyé : lundi 21 octobre 2024 23:38 >>>>>>>>>> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.co >>>>> m >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@ >>>>> orange.com>>>; >>>>>>>>>> Andy Bierman >>>>> <andy@yumaworks.com<mailto:andy@yumaworks.com >>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:andy@yumaworks.com%3cmailto:andy@yumaworks.com>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cc : Mahesh Jethanandani >>>>>>> >> <mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com%3cmailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com> >>>>>> ; >>>>>>>>>> netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org >>>>>>> <mailto:netmod@ietf.org%3cmailto:netmod@ietf.org>>; >>>>>>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org<mailto:draft- >>>> ietf-netmod- >>>>> rfc8407bis@ietf.org >>>>>>> <mailto:draft-ietf-netmod- >>>> rfc8407bis@ietf.org%3cmailto:draft-ietf- >>>>> netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org>>; >>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>>>>> Lindblad >>>> <jlindbla@cisco.com<mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com >>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com%3cmailto:jlindbla@cisco.com>>>; >> Kent >>>>>>> Watsen >>>> <kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net >>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net%3cmailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>>> >>>>>>>>>> Objet : Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod- >>>> rfc8407bis >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Looking at today's (-20) version of the >> document, I >>>> still see >>>>>>>>>> stable pointers as an option. I really don't >> see >>>> the support for >>>>>>>>>> this in the overall discussion and I personally >>>> think such is a >>>>>>>>>> *bad* idea. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'd prefer that any references to the "stable >>>> pointer" option be >>>>>>>>>> removed from the document. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Lou >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 10/15/2024 2:22 AM, >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@ >>>>> orange.com>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andy, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> RFC8340 leaves it to the authors to include >> it or >>>> not. It uses >>>>>>>>>> statements such as "When long diagrams are >> included >>>> in a document, >>>>>>>>>> .." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> An outcome of the discussion is that we can't >>>> impose one option >>>>>>>>>> here. For example, the current situation is >> that we >>>> do already >>>>>>>>>> have RFCs (RFC7407, RFC9182, RFC9291, etc.) >> that do >>>> not include >>>>>>>>>> the full trees because these are too long, the >>>> narrative text is >>>>>>>>>> good enough, the document itself is +150 pages, >>>> etc. Also, >>>>>>>>>> including pages and pages of text that exceeds >> the >>>> max line is not >>>>>>>>>> convenient for readers. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The new guidelines include a provision for >> when >>>> the full tree is >>>>>>>>>> not included for better consistency among >> published >>>> documents. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> Med >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- >>>>>>>>>>>> De : Andy Bierman >>>>>>> <andy@yumaworks.com<mailto:andy@yumaworks.com >>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:andy@yumaworks.com%3cmailto:andy@yumaworks.com>>> >>>>> Envoyé : >>>>>>> lundi 14 >>>>>>>>>> octobre 2024 >>>>>>>>>>>> 18:24 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.co >>>>> m >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@ >>>>> orange.com>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cc : Mahesh Jethanandani >>>>>>> >> <mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com%3cmailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com> >>>>>> ; >>>>>>> Lou Berger >>>>>>>>>>>> <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net >>>>>>> >> <mailto:lberger@labn.net%3cmailto:lberger@labn.net>>>; >>>>>>> netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org >>>>>>> <mailto:netmod@ietf.org%3cmailto:netmod@ietf.org>>; >>>> draft-ietf- >>>>> netmod- >>>>>>>>>>>> >> rfc8407bis@ietf.org<mailto:rfc8407bis@ietf.org >>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:rfc8407bis@ietf.org%3cmailto:rfc8407bis@ietf.org>>; >> Jan >>>>>>> Lindblad >> <jlindbla@cisco.com<mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com >>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com%3cmailto:jlindbla@cisco.com>>>; >> Kent >>>>>>>>>> Watsen >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> <kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net >>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net%3cmailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>>> >>>>>>> Objet : Re: [netmod] WGLC on >>>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> IMO we do not need new procedures to save >> the >>>> reader from a >>>>> few >>>>>>>>>> extra >>>>>>>>>>>> pages of YANG tree diagram text. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is the only option that makes sense to >> me: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Include the full tree in an appendix. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Andy >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 10:19 PM >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.co >>>>> m >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@ >>>>> orange.com>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Mahesh, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, this refers to the main body per the >>>> structure in >>>>>>>>>>>> rfc7322#section-4. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Updated accordingly. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The diff is available using the same link: >>>> Diff: >>>>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis.txt - draft- >> ietf- >>>> netmod- >>>>>>>>>>>> rfc8407bis.txt >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F% >>>> 2 >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F% >>>> 252><ht >>>>> >>>> >> tps://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%252 >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Faut >>>>>>>>>>>>> hor- >>>>>>>>>>>> tools.ietf.org >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2 >>>> >> Ftools.ietf.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com% >>>> >>> >> 7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f >>>> >>> 5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806792761%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8e >>> yJWIjo >>>> >>> >> iMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7 >>>> >>> C%7C%7C&sdata=VfNCeAL5MNmPRmZYSMuY2APsbuR%2FXbRYhC2TWipVpvg >>> %3D&re >>>> >> served=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=htt >> p%3A%2F%2Fhtt%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C >> 2e2ccd3b7ca947d5ff7308dcfe65721f%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d >> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664958911924076%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiM >> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C% >> 7C%7C&sdata=srDAAXFqK4dOzNJHzcApv6NMiwPv36LcFTKkPc8bdMw%3D&reserv >> ed=0 >>>> >>> >> p%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40o >>> r >>>> >>> >> ange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc >>> 4 >>>> >>> 8b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806808244%7CUnknown%7CTWFp >>> bGZsb3 >>>> >> d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0 >>>> %3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=yMttcTY8gRLF31qD4UK%2Bw3%2BNDp%2FiV >>> hi%2FMk >>>> 8%2FYXGlvvw%3D&reserved=0>%2Fapi%2Fiddiff%3Furl_1%3Dht >>>>> tps%3A%2F%2Fnetmod- >>>>>>>>>> wg.gi >>>>>>>>>>>>> thub.io >>>>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2 >>>> >>> Fthub.io%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cc4a >>> 8f >>>> >>> >> 5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7 >>> C >>>> >>> 0%7C0%7C638664100806824255%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiM >>> C4wLj >>>> >>> >> AwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7 >>> C >>>> >>> &sdata=TyRjiAesKMMSGJX5BUXymM1unzDMnvZSEYBVDleJDVA%3D&reserve >>> d=0> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2 >>>> >>> Fthub.io%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cc4a >>> 8f >>>> >>> >> 5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7 >>> C >>>> >>> 0%7C0%7C638664100806839350%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiM >>> C4wLj >>>> >>> >> AwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7 >>> C >>>> >>> >> &sdata=LDY0a4Hv3bqgBGjSDgFbt1Eq%2BVjvrcjV6uG0I4djg0U%3D&reserved= >>>> 0>%2Frfc8407bis%2Fdraft-ietf-netmod- >>>>>>>>>>>> rfc8407bis.txt%26url_2%3Dhttp >>>>>>>>>>>>> s%3A%2F%2Fnetmod-wg.github.io >>>>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2 >>>> F2fnetmod- >>>> >>> wg.github.io%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7 >>> Cc >>>> >>> >> 4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d2 >>>> >>> 0%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806854954%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ >>> WIjoiMC >>>> >>> >> 4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7 >>>> >>> C%7C&sdata=Sy9yOWcDBmeOtu3BcxAg5NWdvaLH9%2Fp%2B%2F4PdutN6ST >>> s%3D&r >>>> eserved=0><http://2fnetmod- >>>>> wg.github.io/>%2Frfc8407bis%2Flong- >>>>>>>>>> trees%2Fdraft- >>>>>>>>>>>> ietf-n >>>>>>>>>>>>> etmod- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> rfc8407bis.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com >>>>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2 >>>> >>> F40orange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com >>> %7C >>>> >>> >> c4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d >>>> >>> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806872719%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ >>> WIjoiM >>>> >>> >> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C% >>>> >>> 7C%7C&sdata=MP1BKR1%2BEOHWN5ViuE%2BRJiUoQ0%2FvGDGrKrsiag3vqJo >>> %3D& >>>> >> reserved=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=h >> ttp%3A%2F%2Fh%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C >> 2e2ccd3b7ca947d5ff7308dcfe65721f%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d >> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664958911972258%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiM >> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C% >> 7C%7C&sdata=dsC6ETRgsXPPvP0Mu3N7b56z2%2FcnzA77LJI3L5YONxc%3D&rese >> rved=0 >>>> >>> ttp%3A%2F%2F40orange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair% >>> 40or >>>> >>> >> ange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc >>> 4 >>>> >>> 8b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806888862%7CUnknown%7CTWFp >>> bGZsb3 >>>> >> d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0 >>>> %3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=GQG6iITz%2FV1bgRRbe3yiEjJzZQl1SbzbYmuH >>> xTf9 >>>> GRA%3D&reserved=0>%7C3 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> 60a053d61314c7851bc08dcec6c99f5%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d >>>>> 20 >>>>>>>>>>>> %7C0 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >> %7C0%7C638645198411517106%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d >>> 8e >>>>> yJWIjoiMC4wLjAw >>>>>>>>>>>> MDAi >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> LCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata >>>>> = >>>>>>>>>>>> PUXU >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> FFa2G1oGYjtnRYtC9hFJkRu5Nx%2FISQob3izoYds%3D&reserved=0> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Med >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *De :* Mahesh Jethanandani >>>>>>> >> <mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com%3cmailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com> >>>>>> >>>>>>> *Envoyé >>>>>>>>>> :* >>>>>>>>>>>> samedi >>>>>>>>>>>>> 12 octobre 2024 01:54 *À :* BOUCADAIR >> Mohamed >>>> INNOV/NET >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.co >>>>> m >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@ >>>>> orange.com>>> >>>>>>> *Cc :* Lou Berger >>>>>>>>>>>> <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net >>>>>>> >> <mailto:lberger@labn.net%3cmailto:lberger@labn.net>>>; >>>>>>>>>>>>> netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org >>>>>>> <mailto:netmod@ietf.org%3cmailto:netmod@ietf.org>>; >>>>>>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org<mailto:draft- >>>> ietf-netmod- >>>>> rfc8407bis@ietf.org >>>>>>> <mailto:draft-ietf-netmod- >>>> rfc8407bis@ietf.org%3cmailto:draft-ietf- >>>>> netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org>>; >>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>>>>>>> Lindblad >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> <jlindbla@cisco.com<mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com >>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com%3cmailto:jlindbla@cisco.com>>>; >> Kent >>>>>>> Watsen >>>> <kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net >>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net%3cmailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Objet >>>>>>>>>>>> :* Re: >>>>>>>>>>>>> [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod- >> rfc8407bis >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Med, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Speaking as a contributor ... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 11, 2024, at 8:47 AM, >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@ >>>>> orange.com>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Lou, Kent, all, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Taking into account the feedback received >> so >>>> far, I suggest >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> following >>>>>>>>>>>>> change: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OLD: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> YANG tree diagrams provide a concise >>>> representation of a >>>>>>>>>> YANG >>>>>>>>>>>>> module >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and SHOULD be included to help readers >>>> understand YANG >>>>>>>>>> module >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> structure. If the complete tree >> diagram >>>> for a module >>>>>>>>>> becomes >>>>>>>>>>>> long >>>>>>>>>>>>> (more than 2 pages, typically), the >> diagram >>>> SHOULD be >>>>>>>>>> split >>>>>>>>>>>> into >>>>>>>>>>>>> several smaller diagrams (a.k.a >>>> subtrees). For the >>>>>>>>>> reader's >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> convenience, a subtree should fit >> within a >>>> page. If the >>>>>>>>>>>> complete >>>>>>>>>>>>> tree diagram is too long (more than 5 >>>> pages, typically) >>>>>>>>>> even >>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>> groupings unexpanded (Section 2.2 of >>>> [RFC8340]), the >>>>>>>>>> authors >>>>>>>>>>>> SHOULD >>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT include it in the document. A >> stable >>>> pointer to >>>>>>>>>> retrieve >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> full tree MAY be included. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NEW: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> YANG tree diagrams provide a concise >>>> representation of a >>>>>>>>>> YANG >>>>>>>>>>>>> module >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and SHOULD be included to help readers >>>> understand YANG >>>>>>>>>> module >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> structure. If the complete tree >> diagram >>>> for a module >>>>>>>>>> becomes >>>>>>>>>>>> long >>>>>>>>>>>>> (more than 2 pages, typically), the >> diagram >>>> SHOULD be >>>>>>>>>> split >>>>>>>>>>>> into >>>>>>>>>>>>> several smaller diagrams (a.k.a >>>> subtrees). For the >>>>>>>>>> reader's >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> convenience, a subtree should fit >> within a >>>> page. If the >>>>>>>>>>>> complete >>>>>>>>>>>>> tree diagram is too long (more than 5 >>>> pages, typically) >>>>>>>>>> even >>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>> groupings unexpanded (Section 2.2 of >>>> [RFC8340]), the >>>>>>>>>> authors >>>>>>>>>>>> SHOULD >>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT include it in the main >>>> document. Instead, authors MAY >>>>>>>>>>>> consider >>>>>>>>>>>>> the following options: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [mj] Not clear what you mean by “main >>>> document”. Do you >>>>> mean >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> normative section of the document? If so, >>>> please edit it to >>>>>>>>>> say >>>>>>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Provide only a stable pointer to >>>> retrieve the full >>>>>>>>>> tree. >>>>>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>>>>>> full >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> tree is thus not provided at all. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Include a note about how to generate >> the >>>> full tree. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> * A combination of the first and >> second >>>> bullets. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Include the full tree in an >> appendix. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For convenience: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Diff: Diff: draft-ietf-netmod- >>>> rfc8407bis.txt - >>>>>>>>>>>>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis.txt >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F% >>>> 2 >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F% >>>> 252><ht >>>>> >>>> >> tps://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%252 >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Fauthor- >>>>>>>>>>>> tools.ietf.org >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2 >>>> >> Ftools.ietf.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com% >>>> >>> >> 7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f >>>> >>> 5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806918991%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8e >>> yJWIjo >>>> >>> >> iMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7 >>>> >>> C%7C%7C&sdata=jTBhYuGiw%2Fot%2F4cGtpVSxSM7HkT3B%2FcvR6IRzblm2w >>> A%3 >>>> >> D&reserved=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url >>>> >>> >> =http%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair% >>>> >>> >> 40orange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40 >>> b >>>> >>> fbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806934052%7CUnknown%7CT >>> WFpbG >>>> >> Zsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI >>>> >>> 6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=trBrGAzFEGEIhfh4%2BPNs4Vjjd%2BXNn >>> %2B0o >>>> vwTL5arrozQ%3D&reserved=0>%2Fapi%2Fiddiff%3Furl_1%3Dht >>>>> tps%3A%2F%2Fnetmod- >>>>>>>>>>>> wg.github.io >>>>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2 >>>> >>> >> Fwg.github.io%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7 >>> C >>>> >>> >> c4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d >>>> >>> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806949696%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ >>> WIjoiM >>>> >>> >> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C% >>>> >>> 7C%7C&sdata=VxytcQup6rnh%2FZdw8zTKNomLIDj8mk4vrRxiZ6cOK58%3D&r >>> ese >>>> >> rved=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http% >>>> >>> 3A%2F%2Fwg.github.io%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40oran >>> ge >>>> >> .com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b >>> 92 >>>> >>> 53b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806964621%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs >>> b3d8ey >>>> >> JWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D% >>>> >>> 7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=YjrpxzPL59hd0PEyhqgjVmVN5hNWKc2FVP1MwztkFT >>> 4%3D >>>> &reserved=0>%2Frfc8407bis%2Fdraft- >>>>> ietf-netmod- >>>>>>>>>>>> >> rfc8407bis.txt%26url_2%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fnetmod- >>>>>>>>>>>> wg.github.io >>>>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2 >>>> >>> >> Fwg.github.io%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7 >>> C >>>> >>> >> c4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d >>>> >>> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806980907%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ >>> WIjoiM >>>> >>> >> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C% >>>> >>> 7C%7C&sdata=86zhJlYv7u%2BrPmp%2BTsXMdRn%2BOxkbcEXX2VKcPqgHH50 >>> %3D& >>>> >> reserved=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=h >> ttp%3A%2F%2Fh%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C >> 2e2ccd3b7ca947d5ff7308dcfe65721f%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d >> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664958912038137%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiM >> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C% >> 7C%7C&sdata=%2FwASORd9LSWOSjEj%2BvjYWLyR6uKdlgtMZmBZziYjIgE%3D&re >> served=0 >>>> >>> ttp%3A%2F%2Fwg.github.io%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40 >>> or >>>> >>> >> ange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc >>> 4 >>>> >>> 8b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806995782%7CUnknown%7CTWFp >>> bGZsb3 >>>> >> d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0 >>>> %3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=2xF4EN8QJcX5rpTjAiSrV%2FdRHcw6gnWjZKB >>> MhsnN >>>> MOk%3D&reserved=0>%2Frfc8407bis%2Flong- >>>>> trees%2Fdraft-ietf-netmod- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> rfc8407bis.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com >>>>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2 >>>> >>> F40orange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com >>> %7C >>>> >>> >> c4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d >>>> >>> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807010471%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ >>> WIjoiM >>>> >>> >> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C% >>>> >>> 7C%7C&sdata=SsdXIpT81tZewnxw0uJjfqKIsV8qoG3kPsNuQ96nwbw%3D&rese >>> rv >>>> >> ed=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A >>>> %2F%2F40orange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40ora >>> nge.c >>>> >>> om%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b92 >>> 53 >>>> >>> b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807031840%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3 >>> d8eyJW >>>> >> IjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C >>>> >>> 0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=l46DAl8atRK2yRPhCwsu%2F54yT9aztTveEZL3qGIDEKg% >>> 3D >>>> &reserved=0>%7C360 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> a053d61314c7851bc08dcec6c99f5%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20 >>>>> %7 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> C0%7C0%7C638645198411540339%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoi >>>>> MC4wLj >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> AwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7 >>>>> C& >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> sdata=68CtKMDgxzWjl4IsKqxJlSLpvOHAflb0Cv5TQFwExN0%3D&reserved=0> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - PR: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 >>>> F >>>>>>>>>>>> gith >>>>>>>>>>>>> ub.com >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2 >>>> >>> Fub.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cc4a >>> 8f5 >>>> >>> >> a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C >>> 0 >>>> %7C0%7C638664100807055898%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoi >>> MC4wLjA >>>> >>> >> wMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C >>> & >>>> >>> >> sdata=KY1spdVRlh3ukyN06ph3gISPBzV%2Becgy0s6rgvRt69Y%3D&reserved=0 >>>> >>> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F% >>>> >>> 2Fub.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cc4 >>> a8f >>>> >>> >> 5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7 >>> C >>>> >>> 0%7C0%7C638664100807071783%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiM >>> C4wLj >>>> >>> >> AwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7 >>> C >>>> >>> &sdata=QYf6v2qoioeM9Ox6IWkxtRuZzk9boKyANJueV6ewJyA%3D&reserved= >>> 0> >>>> %2Fnetmod- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> wg%2Frfc8407bis%2Fpull%2F70%2Ffiles&data=05%7C02%7Cmoh >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> amed.boucadair%40orange.com >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2 >>>> >>> F40orange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com >>> %7C >>>> >>> >> c4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d >>>> >>> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807090818%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ >>> WIjoiM >>>> >>> >> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C% >>>> >>> >> 7C%7C&sdata=CvKlxRdy7CxnoLaEzKoXHjxj995wEoTwiyUEfasSN3k%3D&reserv >>>> >> ed=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A >>>> %2F%2F40orange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40ora >>> nge.c >>>> >>> om%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b92 >>> 53 >>>> >>> b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807112214%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3 >>> d8eyJW >>>> >> IjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C >>>> >>> 0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=C2zNv8IfYZBf7W%2FNiU9bC33XAo%2F2BqpSI7QbmRq >>> dHBE% >>>> 3D&reserved=0>%7C360a053d61314c7851bc >>>>> 08dcec6c99f5%7C9 >>>>>>>>>>>> 0c7a >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> 20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638645198411557810%7CUn >>>>> known >>>>>>>>>>>> %7CT >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> WFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLC >>>> J >>>>>>>>>>>> XVCI >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> 6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2BkYIcnZV7Wwi4tUS6uOObRMUMcdt4 >>>>> xxyiNBOW >>>>>>>>>>>> QXGp >>>>>>>>>>>>> wE%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Better? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Med >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *De :* BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Envoyé :* mercredi 2 octobre 2024 11:13 *À >> :* >>>> 'Lou Berger' >>>>>>>>>>>>> <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net >>>>>>> >> <mailto:lberger@labn.net%3cmailto:lberger@labn.net>>>; >>>>>>> netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org >>>>>>> <mailto:netmod@ietf.org%3cmailto:netmod@ietf.org>>; >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org<mailto:draft- >>>> ietf-netmod- >>>>> rfc8407bis@ietf.org >>>>>>> <mailto:draft-ietf-netmod- >>>> rfc8407bis@ietf.org%3cmailto:draft-ietf- >>>>> netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org>>; >>>>>>> Jan Lindblad (jlindbla) >>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> jlindbla@cisco.com<mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com >>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com%3cmailto:jlindbla@cisco.com>>> *Cc >> :* >>>>>>> Kent Watsen >>>> <kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net >>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net%3cmailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Objet >>>>>>>>>>>>> :* RE: [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf- >> netmod- >>>> rfc8407bis >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Lou, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Keeping long trees in the main >> document >>>> is really not >>>>>>>>>>>> helpful to >>>>>>>>>>>>> digest a module. I also know by >> experience >>>> that this >>>>>>>>>> raises >>>>>>>>>>>> comments, >>>>>>>>>>>>> including from the IESG. >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Keeping long trees that exceed 69 >> line >>>> max in the main >>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>> as an >>>>>>>>>>>>> appendix is really hard to follow. >>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are already RFCs out there do >> not >>>> include long >>>>>>>>>> trees, >>>>>>>>>>>> but a >>>>>>>>>>>>> note about how to generate it. The >>>> narrative text uses >>>>>>>>>> small >>>>>>>>>>>> snippets to >>>>>>>>>>>>> help readers walk through the model. >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Some consistency is needed in how we >>>> document our >>>>>>>>>> modules + >>>>>>>>>>>> help >>>>>>>>>>>>> authors with clear guidance (e.g., >>>> characterize what is a >>>>>>>>>>>> long >>>>>>>>>>>>> tree) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m afraid that we can’t simply leave the >> OLD >>>> 8407 as it is. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That’s said, I’m only the pen holder and >> will >>>> implement >>>>>>>>>> whatever >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> WG decides here. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Med >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *De :* Lou Berger >>>>>>> <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net >>>>>>> >> <mailto:lberger@labn.net%3cmailto:lberger@labn.net>>> >>>> *Envoyé :* >>>>>>> mardi 1 >>>>>>>>>> octobre 2024 >>>>>>>>>>>>> 13:37 *À :* BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.co >>>>> m >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@ >>>>> orange.com>>>; >>>>>>>>>>>>> netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org >>>>>>> <mailto:netmod@ietf.org%3cmailto:netmod@ietf.org>>; >>>>>>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org<mailto:draft- >>>> ietf-netmod- >>>>> rfc8407bis@ietf.org >>>>>>> <mailto:draft-ietf-netmod- >>>> rfc8407bis@ietf.org%3cmailto:draft-ietf- >>>>> netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org>>; >>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>>>>>>> Lindblad >>>>>>>>>>>>> (jlindbla) >>>> <jlindbla@cisco.com<mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com >>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com%3cmailto:jlindbla@cisco.com>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Cc :* Kent Watsen >>>>>>> <kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net >>>>>>> >>>> <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net%3cmailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>>> >>>>>>> *Objet :* Re: >>>>>>>>>> [netmod] >>>>>>>>>>>> Re: >>>>>>>>>>>>> WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Med, Jan, WG, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have to say that I read the discussion >>>> concluding with to >>>>>>>>>> NOT >>>>>>>>>>>> change >>>>>>>>>>>>> the current recommendation, see >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 >>>> F >>>>>>>>>>>> mail >>>>>>>>>>>>> archive.ietf.org >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2 >>>> >> Farchive.ietf.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.co >>>> >>> >> m%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253 >>> b >>>> >>> 6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807140589%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d >>> 8eyJWI >>>> >>> >> joiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0 >>>> %7C%7C%7C&sdata=qsNMvTvkfOvGnRenMhLSwGgBOSWtX03vX6TVEou7X >>> GQ%3D&re >>>> >> served=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=htt >> p%3A%2F%2Fhtt%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C >> 2e2ccd3b7ca947d5ff7308dcfe65721f%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d >> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664958912126893%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiM >> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C% >> 7C%7C&sdata=QZrD4vgLmhDx6Krg1Vsik9zoLZCmM6M2%2Bu%2Fx5V5DaAI%3D&re >> served=0 >>>> >>> >> p%3A%2F%2Farchive.ietf.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%4 >>> 0 >>>> >>> >> orange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bf >>> b >>>> >>> c48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807156836%7CUnknown%7CTW >>> FpbGZs >>>> >> b3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6M >>>> >>> n0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=I7PQXzYGTMNQfvIk15GrIYm4H%2FYzuVVoIJ >>> vHpZ >>>> 4CTps%3D&reserved=0>%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fnetmo >>>>> d%2F0Q0YiyNi15V- >>>>>>>>>> Szzf5awLVh- >>>>>>>>>>>> 15_c%2 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2 >>>> >>> F40orange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com >>> %7C >>>> >>> >> c4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d >>>> >>> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807173045%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ >>> WIjoiM >>>> >>> >> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C% >>>> >>> 7C%7C&sdata=K9HTQS6eEvEHh0gI%2BanvbwXOFrdV7idWLzetVngUB2g%3D& >>> rese >>>> >> rved=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http% >>>> >>> 3A%2F%2F40orange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40or >>> ange >>>> >> .com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b >>> 92 >>>> >>> 53b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807192489%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs >>> b3d8ey >>>> >> JWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D% >>>> >>> 7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=D6QMha6Uy%2BWaRh%2BDKPWBt%2FG6RJ3%2BZYI >>> asNLytR >>>> UxlFY%3D&reserved=0>%7C360a053d61314c78 >>>>>>>>>>>> 51bc >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> 08dcec6c99f5%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C63864 >>>>> 519 >>>>>>>>>>>> 8411 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> 573595%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2l >>>>> uMzI >>>>>>>>>>>> iLCJ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> BTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FuJbQGSOk7%2Fk >>>>> MXATR >>>>>>>>>>>> 1fn3 >>>>>>>>>>>>> YScP4MBfkRWYvYXz90NyNI%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I personally use an ereader (or computer) >> more >>>> than paper and >>>>>>>>>>>> having >>>>>>>>>>>>> to go to a static URL -- probably when I'm >> off >>>> line -- does >>>>>>>>>> NOT >>>>>>>>>>>> seem >>>>>>>>>>>>> like something we should be >>>> recommending. Furthermore, I'm >>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>> sure >>>>>>>>>>>>> what our process has to say about having >> the >>>> HTML include >>>>>>>>>> *text >>>>>>>>>>>>> content* that is not in the text version. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Again just my perspective. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What do others think? do they feel strongly >>>> that this change >>>>>>>>>>>> from the >>>>>>>>>>>>> current recommendation (in RFC8340) of >> having >>>> long trees in >>>>>>>>>>>> appendixes >>>>>>>>>>>>> is a good or bad idea? (Yes, I'm in the >>>> strongly against >>>>>>>>>> camp.) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Lou >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/1/2024 4:24 AM, >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@ >>>>> orange.com>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Lou, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. The comment that triggered the >> change >>>> and companion >>>>>>>>>> thread >>>>>>>>>>>> where >>>>>>>>>>>>> this was discussed and changes proposed >> can >>>> be seen at: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 >>>> F >>>>>>>>>>>> mail >>>>>>>>>>>>> archive.ietf.org >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2 >>>> >> Farchive.ietf.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.co >>>> >>> >> m%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253 >>> b >>>> >>> 6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807218227%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d >>> 8eyJWI >>>> >>> >> joiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0 >>>> >> %7C%7C%7C&sdata=PB4vsiUa8qxziZ7Ukkxl3TdYCYDtY0a8CYG6TxY4Dhg%3D >>> &re >>>> >> served=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=htt >> p%3A%2F%2Fhtt%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C >> 2e2ccd3b7ca947d5ff7308dcfe65721f%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d >> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664958912169243%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiM >> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C% >> 7C%7C&sdata=zefWbioKHBvnvFu27ZcUJiVFcQGf%2FxQph2ydRm3cXUk%3D&rese >> rved=0 >>>> >>> >> p%3A%2F%2Farchive.ietf.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%4 >>> 0 >>>> >>> >> orange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bf >>> b >>>> >>> c48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807236040%7CUnknown%7CTW >>> FpbGZs >>>> >> b3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6M >>>> >>> n0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=KbINQdJdgp1vtJFViA%2B7gXuGvSShxJeaetCl >>> %2 >>>> FlP87Ws%3D&reserved=0>%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fnetmo >>>>> d%2F- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> b2HX0XUK49qJB19LHu6MC0D9zc%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucada >>>>> ir%40o >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> range.com >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2 >>>> >>> Frange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C >>> c4a >>>> >>> >> 8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20% >>>> >>> 7C0%7C0%7C638664100807256811%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjo >>> iMC4w >>>> >>> >> LjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C% >>>> >>> 7C&sdata=TtLqWyyWb%2BwejIBTL1Vnbw1F7bD1%2Bo8NNQjDxximv4A%3D& >>> reser >>>> >> ved=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3 >>>> >>> A%2F%2Frange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange. >>> com >>>> >> %7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253 >>> b6 >>>> >>> f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807277742%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8 >>> eyJWIj >>>> >> oiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0% >>>> >>> 7C%7C%7C&sdata=NOf%2FS%2BV%2BmVoo0kqY3sUbpt80WLS2itsKD1l4YGco >>> t5A% >>>> 3D&reserved=0>%7C360a053d61314c7851bc08dcec >>>>> 6c99f5%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc4 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> 8b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638645198411584985%7CUnknown%7CTWFp >>>>> bGZsb3d >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> 8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0% >>>> 3 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>> D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=r4xdN4asqklRHaI%2BIixWX29CCw7i1QBlmAHlNXr >>>>> Kjng >>>>>>>>>>>> %3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> _________________________________________________________________ >>>>> _ >>>>>>>>>> ____ >>>>>>>>>>> ______________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent >> contenir >>>> des >>>>>>>>>> informations >>>>>>>>>>> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent >>>> donc pas etre >>>>>>>>>> diffuses, >>>>>>>>>>> exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si >> vous >>>> avez recu ce >>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>> par erreur, veuillez le signaler a >> l'expediteur >>>> et le detruire >>>>>>>>>> ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages >>>> electroniques etant >>>>>>>>>> susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute >>>> responsabilite si >>>>>>>>>> ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. >>>> Merci. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This message and its attachments may contain >>>> confidential or >>>>>>>>>>> privileged information that may be protected >> by >>>> law; they should >>>>>>>>>> not be distributed, used or copied without >>>> authorisation. >>>>>>>>>>> If you have received this email in error, >> please >>>> notify the >>>>>>>>>> sender and delete this message and its >> attachments. >>>>>>>>>>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not >> liable >>>> for messages that >>>>>>>>>> have been modified, changed or falsified. >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> _________________________________________________________________ >>>>> ___________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent >> contenir >>>> des >>>>>>> informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne >>>> doivent donc >>>>>>>>> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans >>>> autorisation. Si >>>>>>> vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le >>>> signaler >>>>>>>>> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les >> pieces >>>> jointes. Les >>>>>>> messages electroniques etant susceptibles >> d'alteration, >>>>>>>>> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce >> message a >>>> ete altere, >>>>>>> deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This message and its attachments may contain >>>> confidential or >>>>>>> privileged information that may be protected by >> law; >>>>>>>>> they should not be distributed, used or copied >>>> without >>>>>>> authorisation. >>>>>>>>> If you have received this email in error, please >>>> notify the >>>>>>> sender and delete this message and its attachments. >>>>>>>>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable >> for >>>> messages >>>>>>> that have been modified, changed or falsified. >>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> _________________________________________________________________ >>>>> ___________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir >> des >>>>>>> informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne >>>> doivent donc >>>>>>>> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans >>>> autorisation. Si >>>>>>> vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le >>>> signaler >>>>>>>> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les >> pieces >>>> jointes. Les >>>>>>> messages electroniques etant susceptibles >> d'alteration, >>>>>>>> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message >> a >>>> ete altere, >>>>>>> deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This message and its attachments may contain >>>> confidential or >>>>>>> privileged information that may be protected by >> law; >>>>>>>> they should not be distributed, used or copied >>>> without >>>>>>> authorisation. >>>>>>>> If you have received this email in error, please >>>> notify the >>>>>>> sender and delete this message and its attachments. >>>>>>>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable >> for >>>> messages that >>>>>>> have been modified, changed or falsified. >>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> _________________________________________________________________ >>>>> ___ >>>>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir >> des >>>> informations >>>>>>> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans >>>> autorisation. Si vous >>>>>>> avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le >> signaler >>>>>>> >>>>>>> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces >>>> jointes. Les >>>>>>> messages electroniques etant susceptibles >> d'alteration, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a >> ete >>>> altere, >>>>>>> deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This message and its attachments may contain >>>> confidential or >>>>>>> privileged information that may be protected by >> law; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> they should not be distributed, used or copied >> without >>>> authorisation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you have received this email in error, please >> notify >>>> the sender >>>>>>> and delete this message and its attachments. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for >>>> messages that >>>>>>> have been modified, changed or falsified. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> _________________________________________________________________ >>>>> ___ >>>>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>>>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des >>>> informations >>>>>>> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas >> etre >>>>>>> diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si >> vous >>>> avez recu >>>>>>> ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a >> l'expediteur >>>> et le detruire ainsi >>>>> que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant >>>> susceptibles >>>>> d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce >> message >>>> a ete altere, >>>>> deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This message and its attachments may contain >> confidential >>>> or >>>>>>> privileged information that may be protected by law; >> they >>>> should not be >>>>> distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >>>>>>> If you have received this email in error, please notify >> the >>>> sender and delete >>>>> this message and its attachments. >>>>>>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for >> messages >>>> that have been >>>>> modified, changed or falsified. >>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> netmod mailing list -- netmod@ietf.org To unsubscribe >> send an >>>> email to >>>>>> netmod-leave@ietf.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jürgen Schönwälder Constructor University >> Bremen >>>> gGmbH >>>>> Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 >> Bremen | >>>> Germany >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> netmod mailing list -- netmod@ietf.org >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to netmod-leave@ietf.org >>> >> _________________________________________________________________ >>> ___________________________________________ >>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des >> informations >>> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc >>> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si >> vous avez recu ce >>> message par erreur, veuillez le signaler >>> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les >> messages >>> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, >>> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, >> deforme ou >>> falsifie. Merci. >>> >>> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or >> privileged >>> information that may be protected by law; >>> they should not be distributed, used or copied without >> authorisation. >>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the >> sender and delete this >>> message and its attachments. >>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages >> that have been >>> modified, changed or falsified. >>> Thank you. > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list -- netmod@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to netmod-leave@ietf.org
- [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Kent Watsen
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Lou Berger
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Kent Watsen
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Qin Wu
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Lou Berger
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Mahesh Jethanandani
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Kent Watsen
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Lou Berger
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Kent Watsen
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Reshad Rahman
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis tom petch
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Mahesh Jethanandani
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Andy Bierman
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Lou Berger
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis tom petch
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Andy Bierman
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Lou Berger
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Lou Berger
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Andy Bierman
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Lou Berger
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Lou Berger
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Jürgen Schönwälder
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Italo Busi
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Jürgen Schönwälder
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Lou Berger
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] It's not junk! was Re: Re: WGLC on draft… tom petch
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Italo Busi
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Lou Berger
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Jürgen Schönwälder
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Kent Watsen
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Benoit Claise
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Andy Bierman
- [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis mohamed.boucadair