Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)

Erik Auerswald <auerswal@unix-ag.uni-kl.de> Wed, 04 September 2019 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <auerswal@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F401200DB; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 02:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6qRfHy-oDZMY; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 02:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.uni-kl.de (mailgw1.uni-kl.de [IPv6:2001:638:208:120::220]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DE1F1200C1; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 02:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sushi.unix-ag.uni-kl.de (sushi.unix-ag.uni-kl.de [IPv6:2001:638:208:ef34:0:ff:fe00:65]) by mailgw1.uni-kl.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x849C7VH129370 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:12:07 +0200
Received: from sushi.unix-ag.uni-kl.de (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sushi.unix-ag.uni-kl.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with ESMTP id x849C6OX024658 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:12:07 +0200
Received: (from auerswal@localhost) by sushi.unix-ag.uni-kl.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id x849C5HI024653; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:12:05 +0200
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:12:05 +0200
From: Erik Auerswald <auerswal@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20190904091205.GA18225@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
References: <156755725979.20611.1246275298689979326.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <156755725979.20611.1246275298689979326.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/j5xWwuiWUEyhY50oNfFULzfw-NI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 09:12:13 -0000

Hi Adam,

please see below (inline).

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 05:34:19PM -0700, Adam Roach via Datatracker wrote:
> Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: No Objection
> [...]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> [...]
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> > Appendix A.  POSIX Shell Script: rfcfold
> 
> Please add [POSIX.1-2017] as a reference.

The script is not strictly POSIX compatible, as it uses, e.g., the Bash
contruct "[[ ... ]]". Thus I would suggest to change the appendix name
instead: s/POSIX Shell/Bash/

Please note that I did not audit the script for additional non-POSIX
shell constructs.

The script uses non-POSIX tools as well, and sometimes uses tools that
are part of POSIX in a non-portable way, i.e., relying on (common,
but non-standard) extensions to POSIX.

Thanks,
Erik