[netmod] [Errata Rejected] RFC7950 (5879)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 28 October 2019 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EA6120105; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 14:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hh0WHo4PW-3F; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 14:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A5F9120098; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 14:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 98F86F40716; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 14:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
To: lhotka@nic.cz, mbj@tail-f.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ibagdona@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20191028214830.98F86F40716@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 14:48:30 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/jVvCtVifqp3loe2aEuNuc5k4y8U>
Subject: [netmod] [Errata Rejected] RFC7950 (5879)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 21:48:38 -0000

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC7950,
"The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language".

You may review the report below and at:

Status: Rejected
Type: Technical

Reported by: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
Date Reported: 2019-10-22
Rejected by: Ignas Bagdonas (IESG)

Section: 3

Original Text
o  schema tree: The definition hierarchy specified within a module.

Corrected Text
o  schema tree: The hierarchy of schema nodes defined in the set of all modules 
   implemented by a server, as specified in the YANG library data [RFC7895].

The original definition of the term has two problems:

1. Schema tree is not limited to a single module. Some YANG constructs, such as augment and leafref type, may refer to a schema node that is defined in another module.

2. Apart from schema nodes, YANG modules contain definitions that do not contribute to the schema tree: groupings, typedefs, identities etc.
   Rejected based on WG discussion: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/5uDEBwgNehfLaPONpDSjVnCcWx8

RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14)
Title               : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language
Publication Date    : August 2016
Author(s)           : M. Bjorklund, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Network Modeling
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG