IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-01.txt

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Tue, 26 June 2018 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFDF130EC7 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jPPbM02hslDy for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFC8130EAB for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (h-155-4-133-90.NA.cust.bahnhof.se [155.4.133.90]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06BB91AE0311; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 18:10:40 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 18:10:39 +0200
Message-Id: <20180626.181039.392793483287204479.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
Cc: balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com, netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180626154430.zfcwfucwt74zfi73@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
References: <20180626145853.7p7ju7hvzpdv66x4@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <5fb10957-a077-228c-b961-2bff5a935b69@ericsson.com> <20180626154430.zfcwfucwt74zfi73@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/jWfl7u24ojPKhuiAPGZiKCNuZdE>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-01.txt
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:10:43 -0000

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 05:31:27PM +0200, Balazs Lengyel wrote:
> > Hello Juergen,
> > 
> > Sorry the wording was misleading. I want these capabilities both as state
> > data AND as instance-data-files, because
> > there is a need to know this information before you ever see the real
> > network node. How about the following?
> > 
> > "YANG servers SHOULD document server capabilities that are available via Netconf/Restconf (as YANG defined data) also using instance-data-files."
> >
> 
> I am against this. I think we should standardize the format and not
> how the format is used. And it remains unclear why this would be a
> SHOULD or how one implements this SHOULD and in which cases one can
> ignore it. Again, I do not like to mix specification of mechanisms
> with the specification of policies how mechanisms are to be used.

+1

This is what I tried to say as well in my comments on this document.


/martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email