IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] 6021 ipv4-prefix

William Lupton <wlupton@broadband-forum.org> Thu, 18 April 2019 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <wlupton@broadband-forum.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC2C120326 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 06:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=broadband-forum-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IWNbZgIVuZ_2 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 06:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4761A120325 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 06:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id s7so1860130iom.12 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 06:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadband-forum-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8xekmm7vCQmSwfQXrQwKXfJ9sbyDwwFYLtHyiOj8HTI=; b=kuPiDe9/hJDDQU9l55WbTXjHHzjzpJHUNAMu3QBJK3AV45KfQBz2cdqO8Pw6JYYkl2 i4uICRlTLd0ETp7ymi5u1q0IA/NZaH2O/+kPDfEnr38NBkIwPlziJq3bxyF1Mmia/iLf un95EIEfnLcYKFgMAoyGXpoH9Fky1T5qXTrc6Dwd2+jGrxv98a9GXxIvu9+HaCY5wkDO fOn7vy06rv3WAMbUvVG8R6IkqOgQqJyfA3QQqZsh7plQFFRZ+dZA1dAGbPSrmsQDo+sM Ax07fip4KwjQaozR/Mv/J0kAuAu5XWkzpGtDfHKF5LMw57j1k2RxGcrxnB+QtkID6A2w KA6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8xekmm7vCQmSwfQXrQwKXfJ9sbyDwwFYLtHyiOj8HTI=; b=bY7TdGWpCUhq7v+oa7TvmBBcBOxjHiFfPvjIXbkzC7xv/xYZMwxEY2/FRVHePWduuo UDMRF4I8cS8wiabIV8+T06drwEAzGz/LwQgbtGQ2S92jOiYbl5dVvx6CpAKI70OuWqKz CioNRoawYtlR/K7knaNYnr1LcqRUY/zu4lmLRS3YGShJI3ZKA7SAoFp6opxL5Qfa52p0 nClf/52eOTcR7ebIB5GPNf1ZOronYEqaYSgwbqi1CEd1syTkhYw1w/o3Z3D+39CQ8lxP SAI4UWZcKK12JJIgM3TFw0Spi8+NG3FWlDwPNAJu4XULtggglg6sxSwyrNblbThKe44s ou3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUxtaew9Nhe6VpKafVZ2LqJo/MdeqXOEmzAZws+fcxo8FYih52P R7n+q7n3tcwPu4FpL/lApBS27qv3piOWwjuXaRF0ylSVvqk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxF2nvBzvbxS+i4KNMM/WRC79zDMHW8DhII/SBD47mYUsHOlJAw/dXvGf8mG1CI1hW20wDnyPvhh6YImmN8SEI=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8196:: with SMTP id u22mr40224777ion.202.1555593927546; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 06:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <003301d4f498$4f593640$ee0ba2c0$@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1904180906360.3490@uplift.swm.pp.se> <AEA1D9F1-D4A3-46D1-A50B-F4333B0A0412@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <AEA1D9F1-D4A3-46D1-A50B-F4333B0A0412@cisco.com>
From: William Lupton <wlupton@broadband-forum.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:25:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEe_xxg_jngj6XVwxVoq5iwN2dAaGkqx9cN_Rw_nv0pDF_93oA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007774d80586cdefc4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/jYfHqu9WwiFeFHlfqYg8J8peX84>
Subject: Re: [netmod] 6021 ipv4-prefix
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 13:25:30 -0000

On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 09:10, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:

> Since the constraint on the non-masked portion of the prefix is solely in
> the description, there is nothing to prevent this and I'm sure the
> ipv4-prefix and ipv6-prefix types are being used incorrectly.
>

Is a requirement in a description any less normative than a requirement
expressed directly using YANG syntax?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email