Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 18 December 2017 12:56 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120AB128954; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:56:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.631
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HXmhqbqlC5eA; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:56:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79441128896; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:56:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5018; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1513601796; x=1514811396; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=/g1PjmJqCCxg21I6Qolyh6FM5LzfOQPt8a/4KCG3yyE=; b=OK/3thmi0iLybE76kEQqwJWZN8YL9jgL5JgJ4XvaT2tXxxR1fajpEBYW 8G2pvYcaa5GSAT2Jmx4JyLIFXvOzgimTiXwK3nX7EUy8wontCcFbCfwYN jVg8VnRS3DjC9NesYQflFE961Gl7vSRND4/ISCazPSbNlEI7eufyTAQAj M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DDAAACujda/4QNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYM+ZnQnB4N/iiGOVDSCAJchghUKGAuESU8CGoRrPxgBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQFrKIUkAQEEAQEhEToLEAIBCBgCAiYCAgIlCxUQAgQBDQWKKhCqEYInimcBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYEPgl+CDoM/gyyCUF4BGIE2AQEeF4J+gmM?= =?us-ascii?q?FozwCh32NLYIWhhOLSopNgk6JMAIRGQGBOgEfOYFPbxU8gimEVngBh1uBJYEVA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,422,1508803200"; d="scan'208";a="45568014"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 18 Dec 2017 12:56:35 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBICuZe6003813 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:56:35 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:56:34 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:56:34 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
CC: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01
Thread-Index: AQHTdecPhSAo6kKOv0CHaR8SVGCwjKNHxIIAgAGYeAD//7ZngA==
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:56:34 +0000
Message-ID: <D65D24C1.E2FE7%acee@cisco.com>
References: <8568e55c-29c6-272e-dd9f-7d1b150edba6@labn.net> <44e5318a-4157-b825-b688-5185ab2458cb@labn.net> <D65C0ACB.E2B1E%acee@cisco.com> <8737482ppd.fsf@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <8737482ppd.fsf@nic.cz>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <8E7DF4F1A60DC14EA852044687542A29@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/jhAvm-4YCQZV-iAqmWfZPyxDZgY>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:56:38 -0000

Hi Lada, 

On 12/18/17, 7:19 AM, "Ladislav Lhotka" <lhotka@nic.cz>; wrote:

>Hi Acee,
>
>"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>; writes:
>
>> Hi Lou, et al, 
>>
>> The only issue we are struggling with is whether we need to specify the
>> version in the ietf-interfaces import. We have noted that
>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01.txt does not import by revision.
>
>I would suggest to import *without* revision but add a description
>indicating that the NMDA-compatible revisions are needed.
>
>Importing by revision is clearly suboptimal. Hopefully a new mechanism
>such as semantic versioning will be introduced soon to alleviate this
>issue.

I agree and will update the description.
>
>>
>> We also have so nits:
>>
>>    1. Add an informative reference for
>> [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams].
>>    2. Based on a comment from Vladimir, we added the prefix for
>> ietf-routing.yang, “rt:”, to several references within
>>ietf-routing.yang.
>> Was this necessary? Of course, the model compiles with or without the
>> prefix.
>
>RFC6087bis has some rules in sec. 4.2, and these should be followed.

Will review these. 
>
>Also, the security considerations should IMO be changed, see my recent
>message:
>
>https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg19610.html
>
>Of course, the NEW formulation needn't be exactly as I suggested, but
>the text "The YANG module [...] is designed to be accessed ..." is
>apparently wrong and shouldn't be used any more.

Ok - I will also review the “Security Considerations” template.

Thanks,
Acee 

>
>Thanks, Lada
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>>
>> On 12/15/17, 3:55 PM, "netmod on behalf of Lou Berger"
>> <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of lberger@labn.net>; wrote:
>>
>>>All,
>>>	This last call is closed.
>>>
>>>We note that there was an update during the LC and that no comments were
>>>received during the LC period.  As this is simply a mechanical update
>>>that has been discussed in the WG we plan to proceed with the
>>>publication process.
>>>
>>>Authors,
>>>	Please let/us the WG know when you have published a version ready for
>>>publication.  Also please let the WG know what has changed in the
>>>document since the start of LC (rev -01)
>>>
>>>Thank you,
>>>NetMod Chairs
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On 11/29/2017 12:26 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>> 
>>>> This starts a two-week working group last call on
>>>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01.
>>>> 
>>>> Please recall that this update's intention is to
>>>> modify the YANG module to be in line with the NMDA
>>>> guidelines [1].  Reviewing the diff between the two
>>>> drafts [2] should reveal just this.
>>>> 
>>>> The working group last call ends on December 13.
>>>> Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list.
>>>> 
>>>> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
>>>> and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
>>>> This is useful and important, even from authors.
>>>> 
>>>> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01
>>>> [2] 
>>>>https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url1=rfc8022.txt&url2=
>>>>dr
>>>>aft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01.txt
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Netmod Chairs
>>>> 
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>netmod mailing list
>>>netmod@ietf.org
>>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
>-- 
>Ladislav Lhotka
>Head, CZ.NIC Labs
>PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67