IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Quirky YANG

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> Wed, 03 October 2018 23:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B10130DC3; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.955
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.955 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dxmfbj6TCuX5; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 790CB12F295; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10162; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1538610697; x=1539820297; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=OTNYnLyvEGFhiQJyZOgKURJ4oy6mgWHBDZ8uERl6xrU=; b=JcKwRDgFX1wFeyvv9PeTUMdgfeffZ47ZAhw5fA4etPXIvxZ7cYypgSBt 49h3wUbnhRM7FOqRQjhbFsQUIgtI4WJ6pQza55ewIDtIZaOH3kx039FvQ w7UXerx+xeYr4U/2U6IQUQ1SZ+vQy3UXAAT5AHLUobpKcfeBKWnJwbZjf w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AGAAD0VLVb/4UNJK1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUYEXd2Z/KAqDaogVjieIY4g6hUCBeguEbAIXhAkhNBgBAwEBAgEBAm0ohTgBAQEBAyMKTBACAQgOAwMBAigDAgICHxEUCQgCBA4FgyEBgR1MAxWlJIEuhzkNglGLIReBQT+BEicfgkyCVoJIFoJLMYIEIgKJSoQ8jxssCQKNH4MdF49ijQiIIgIRFIElHTiBVXAVZQGCQQmQS2+MSIEfAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,338,1534809600"; d="scan'208,217";a="464338183"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Oct 2018 23:51:36 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w93Npack024844 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 3 Oct 2018 23:51:36 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 18:51:35 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 18:51:35 -0500
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
CC: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [yang-doctors] [netmod] Quirky YANG
Thread-Index: AQHUW2HTol/7t5B5P0eLl3TYYanwGKUOgWAA///AMAA=
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 23:51:35 +0000
Message-ID: <C0D31E51-4EAA-4FFA-BFC6-FE2DE900047B@cisco.com>
References: <AD038D55-D011-4569-AA79-555AC9B2D766@cisco.com> <EAE2FE54-C63D-491A-B022-B8978E26521D@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <EAE2FE54-C63D-491A-B022-B8978E26521D@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.b.0.180311
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.86.254.72]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C0D31E514EAA4FFABFC6FE2DE900047Bciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-11.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/jn1WRySpDqZB6CT_PVGkE5OHgik>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Quirky YANG
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 23:51:41 -0000

Thanks Mahesh. So the IESG is supposed to ask for YD review at this point for draft-ietf-softwire-yang?

From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, October 3, 2018 at 7:38 PM
To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
Cc: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] [netmod] Quirky YANG




On Oct 3, 2018, at 2:41 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <rrahman@cisco.com<mailto:rrahman@cisco.com>> wrote:

Are YD reviews optional for IETF YANG modules? I assumed it was mandatory.

Here is what it says on the YD page:

All YANG documents will be passed by a YANG doctor reviewer before they will be approved by the IESG. The YANG doctor review must be done after the Working Group Last Call and before the IETF Last Call. ADs and WG chairs responsible on I-Ds that include YANG documents should ask the OPS ADs for a review as soon as the document completed WGLC. Failing that request, the review will be conducted during the IETF Last Call.

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status