Re: [netmod] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Tue, 21 January 2020 02:30 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758FA12006E; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:30:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4YksUHc8V7oK; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:30:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7629112006D; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:30:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 00L2UCmS009952 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 21:30:15 -0500
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:30:12 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200121023012.GC80030@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <157861251031.11821.9719140738474484600.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <597a69b9-a7ec-6b63-65e1-0c64d63574f5@unix-ag.uni-kl.de> <0100016fc5a2305d-ea9d8ddb-cbb4-43dd-a784-312903f199c0-000000@email.amazonses.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0100016fc5a2305d-ea9d8ddb-cbb4-43dd-a784-312903f199c0-000000@email.amazonses.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/jpZxVEo7hsp-iw-BMKkXMeZnmrI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 02:30:19 -0000

Hi Kent!

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 01:05:38AM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> Erik and I addressed the regression issue raised below, and made a few other minor improvements to the non-normative `rfcfold` script.
> 
> Here is a direct link to the diff: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-12.txt <https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-12.txt>
> 
> Please let us know if there are anymore improvements to be made.
> 
> Thanks!
> Kent (and Erik)

I don't see any further improvements; this looks really nice now.
(I assume Erik was consulted about the Acknowledgments change (and trust
the RFC Editor to spell "Acknowledgments" according to house style) that's
also part of the -12.)

I'm updating my position in the datatracker now.

-Ben