[netmod] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 10 January 2018 03:10 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietf.org
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359AC1242F7; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 19:10:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151555382321.21465.10788231800400955949.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 19:10:23 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/kOL8LhNlnA-5Weif8uEKwBw16oE>
Subject: [netmod] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 03:10:23 -0000

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Please add a sentence to the Introduction explaining how this document
updates rfc7950.  I know that a couple of sections explicitly indicate what
part of rfc7950 they update, but having a short summary at the beginning would
be nice.

(2) Section 3 says: “It is expected that the revised definitions provided in
this section will replace the definitions in [RFC6241] and [RFC7950] when these
documents are revised.”  Why not formally Update those documents here?  [See my
note above about the Update to rfc7950.]

(3) s/Section 4.4 of this document/Section 4.4 of rfc6244