Re: [netmod] Reminder: WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Mon, 15 January 2018 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419E512D7EC; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 06:39:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0N-aTFOZSqu6; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 06:39:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CBF12D7E2; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 06:39:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.56]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23CDC1AE03DD; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 15:39:35 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 15:39:33 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <20180115.153933.1215610340924130656.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: rwilton@cisco.com
Cc: joelja@bogus.com, netmod@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <66857af8-80b4-8c7c-f952-f04c3f2adaa7@cisco.com>
References: <2cde8b64-0455-a513-4719-feb61c87a952@bogus.com> <d66db346-9ca8-c08d-ea25-4c239d265ad4@bogus.com> <66857af8-80b4-8c7c-f952-f04c3f2adaa7@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/kg2yCTayVBoJQ_TNolaCmRJO_mg>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Reminder: WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:39:38 -0000

Hi,

Thanks for the review!  Comments inline.

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi Lou, Martin
> 
> I've done a quick review of draft -04.
> 
> It looks well written to me.
> 
> I have a spotted a few minor nits/questions.
> 
> Section 1:
> 
> (i) "Such diagrams are commonly used to provided " => "Such diagrams
> are used to provide"?

Ok.

> (ii) "This document provides the syntax used in YANG Tree Diagrams."
> => "This document describes the syntax used in YANG Tree Diagrams", or
> if not "describes", perhaps "specifies"?

I changed to "describes".

> (iii) "common practice is include" => "common practice is to include"

Ok.

> Section 2:
> (iv) Are the top level data nodes really offset by 4 spaces, or should
> this be 2 spaces?  The example in section 2, and section 4 seem to
> differ here.  The submodule example in Sec 2.1 looks like it is using
> 2 spaces.

It should be 4 spaces.  I fixed the example in 2.1.

> (v) "is prefaces with" => "is prefaced with"

Ok.

> (vi) Section 2.2, should there be an example of an unexpanded uses
> statement?  I was wondering if this section was under specified?

I have added:

   For example, the following diagram shows the "tls-transport" grouping
   from [RFC7407] unexpanded:

       +--rw tls
          +---u tls-transport

   If the grouping is expanded, it could be printed as:

       +--rw tls
          +--rw port?                 inet:port-number
          +--rw client-fingerprint?   x509c2n:tls-fingerprint
          +--rw server-fingerprint?   x509c2n:tls-fingerprint
          +--rw server-identity?      snmp:admin-string

> Section 2.6:
> (vii) "If the node is augmented into the tree from another module, its
> name is printed as <prefix>:<name>."  Does there need to be a
> clarification that the prefix name used is the one used by the
> module's import statement?  Or does it use the prefix statement from
> the imported modules instead (I know that these should normally be the
> same, but this is not guaranteed).

Since this is used when a node is augmented *into* the main tree, it
can't be the prefix in import, since the augmenting module is not
imported from the augmented module.  I did:

OLD:

      If the node is augmented into the tree from another module,
      its name is printed as <prefix>:<name>.

NEW:

      If the node is augmented into the tree from another module,
      its name is printed as <prefix>:<name>, where <prefix> is the
      prefix defined in the module where the node is defined.

> Section 3.2.
> (viii) It would be slightly easier to read if there wasn't a linebreak
> between "--" and "tree-print-groupings", not sure if that is feasible
> to force this.

I don't think I can enforce this, but I'll look into it.  If nothing
else, the RFC editor will fix this.


/martin


> 
> Thanks,
> Rob
> 
> On 10/01/2018 16:16, joel jaeggli wrote:
> > Just a reminder given the date that this was posted. This last call is
> > expected to complete Monday 1/15/18.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > joel
> >
> >
> > On 1/1/18 2:01 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> We hope  the new year is a time to make great progess on outstanding
> >> documents before preparation for the  London IETF begins in earnest.
> >>
> >> This starts a two-week working group last call on:
> >>
> >>   YANG Tree Diagrams
> >> draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams
> >>
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams/
> >>
> >> Please send email to the list indicating your support or concerns.
> >>
> >> We are particularly interested in statements of the form:
> >>
> >>    * I have reviewed this draft and found no issues.
> >>    * I have reviewed this draft and found the following issues: ...
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> NETMOD WG Chairs
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > netmod@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> > .
> >
>