Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Sun, 17 December 2017 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9C512785F for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 04:17:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YsaWA1hEoYjD for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 04:17:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF99B1205F1 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 04:17:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2543; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1513513035; x=1514722635; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=xMDz5FY7s8YRSoaMYHX2guwtixoJsbTHNwnQHHx0kVo=; b=kudZp4S2PiJ/9If7eMAonRpI3b4kLH1wJ8h3WMz4yrHDiJyyJmR7WgTN vXp6HTdOijs0TieP1ATuNj0yVC4hizHyHZO0mUv79Bte05FRWrbqj7kwM VWAf05qzhraAQrXAtK+Tx7b/1ZQ4Il1jbJtSL2mMvxOwcuIhR/qyAJDj4 0=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CNAQAfYDZa/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYUYhC2LFY9kMZk2BwOFOwKFQxQBAQEBAQEBAQFrHQuFJAEFI2Y?= =?us-ascii?q?LGCoCAlcGDQgBAYomqQ+CJ4pmAQEBAQEBBAEBAQEBFA+DboV2gwOIMoJjBYpcm?= =?us-ascii?q?GCET4ItjjCBfYoYh16WeIE7NiKBTzIaCBsVgmaEVkCKeAEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,415,1508803200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="968919"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Dec 2017 12:17:09 +0000
Received: from [10.61.192.142] ([10.61.192.142]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBHCH8Kj020621 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 12:17:09 GMT
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <6d6a1b2a-23f8-8bff-a01e-6d13cc73d92f@cisco.com> <20171103084231.GE12688@spritelink.se> <B63D5700-C13B-4D2D-9439-0E4471906374@gmail.com> <a75cf59c-7f5e-0b3b-0ace-ec9be9f67116@cisco.com> <37FA28D8-6799-491C-94CB-04237766E4D3@cisco.com> <2C381B09-15D6-417D-A70D-7C6818306FFC@gmail.com> <CAMMHi8ge4cbrVgRK8=xtJLNYCG1+p+Jh6pFeCy9sEMZP674FHQ@mail.gmail.com> <2826EF6B-A6A6-4FDA-9F30-21830D748C51@cisco.com> <0F43CDE9-21D2-4ED7-AE7C-9A2B9F854101@cisco.com> <fe8b601a-2a02-8011-b913-a49f2f486971@cisco.com> <20171217120038.iwne4nkty4z6kz2t@elstar.local>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <35eabb48-4a1b-eed3-3adc-bc53ae111441@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 13:17:06 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171217120038.iwne4nkty4z6kz2t@elstar.local>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Rvft2hcS5sluMVkKhHMQJqRf2vqQlFfAv"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/klhS3tUb7Kc5w2EKLt9dn-PHDn4>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 12:17:17 -0000


On 17.12.17 13:00, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:29:50PM +0100, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>> I would rather the augment to the interface not be required for
>> implementations that don't actually have interfaces.
> Do you have an example of such a device / implementation?
>

Yes.  Manufacturer Usage Descriptions.  In this case the access-lists of
the ACL model are used to build out an intent description relating to a
device.  There is no specific interface assigned to that intent.

Eliot