Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR verfication request

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Mon, 02 March 2020 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D41C3A12D2; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:15:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9damc2oU9wBW; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:15:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEE663A12D0; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:15:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jmbp.local ([IPv6:2601:647:4200:5811:7945:7c11:6895:e97a]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 022MFE4i067505; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 22:15:14 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: nagasaki.bogus.com: Host [IPv6:2601:647:4200:5811:7945:7c11:6895:e97a] claimed to be jmbp.local
To: Alexander Clemm <alex@futurewei.com>, "draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <14dcbe36-43c3-0a21-4ec8-ad78019eefea@bogus.com> =?utf-8?q?=3CBY?= =?utf-8?q?5PR13MB33002F04671DBA4E4FBFC44CDBED0=40BY5PR13MB3300=2Enamprd13?= =?utf-8?q?=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Pep-Version: 2.0
Message-ID: <7bbe686d-264e-4c6e-8430-5cc51ad0a676@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:15:14 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CBY5PR13MB33002F04671DBA4E4FBFC44CDBED0=40BY5PR13MB?= =?utf-8?q?3300=2Enamprd13=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------B2CBB80E3ECE0AFDCB82EA58"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/liqKfh3WtVnglh9EqTJewkH5b8s>
Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR verfication request
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 22:15:21 -0000

thanks

joel

On 2/25/20 12:17, Alexander Clemm wrote:
> Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules.  
> (Back in 2017; see datatracker)
> --- Alex
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joel Jaeggli
>> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2020 11:45 AM
>> To: draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
>> Subject: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR verfication request
>>
>> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>>
>> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
>>
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>>
>> Please state either:
>>
>> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>> or
>> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>>
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs
>> 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>>
>> If yes to the above, please state either:
>>
>> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>> or
>> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>>
>> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate.
>>
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above
>> by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any
>> relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response
>> has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS
>> APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>>
>> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an
>> author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR
>> rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others
>> on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or
>> discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see
>> the RFCs listed above and
>> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftrac.to
>> ols.ietf.org%2Fgroup%2Fiesg%2Ftrac%2Fwiki%2FIntellectualProperty&amp;dat
>> a=02%7C01%7Calex%40futurewei.com%7C48a1503b85ce4447c93008d7b3e1d
>> 732%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637175654901969
>> 545&amp;sdata=2AeUnZCMLnT4c34lcAQ0j4PAjb%2F%2BwAavkLfcXvptQv4%3
>> D&amp;reserved=0.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> NetMod WG Chairs
>>
>> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.
>>
>