Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR verfication request
Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Mon, 02 March 2020 22:15 UTC
Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D41C3A12D2; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:15:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9damc2oU9wBW; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:15:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEE663A12D0; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:15:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jmbp.local ([IPv6:2601:647:4200:5811:7945:7c11:6895:e97a]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 022MFE4i067505; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 22:15:14 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: nagasaki.bogus.com: Host [IPv6:2601:647:4200:5811:7945:7c11:6895:e97a] claimed to be jmbp.local
To: Alexander Clemm <alex@futurewei.com>, "draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <14dcbe36-43c3-0a21-4ec8-ad78019eefea@bogus.com> <BY5PR13MB33002F04671DBA4E4FBFC44CDBED0@BY5PR13MB3300.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Pep-Version: 2.0
Message-ID: <7bbe686d-264e-4c6e-8430-5cc51ad0a676@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:15:14 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR13MB33002F04671DBA4E4FBFC44CDBED0@BY5PR13MB3300.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------B2CBB80E3ECE0AFDCB82EA58"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/liqKfh3WtVnglh9EqTJewkH5b8s>
Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR verfication request
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 22:15:21 -0000
thanks joel On 2/25/20 12:17, Alexander Clemm wrote: > Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules. > (Back in 2017; see datatracker) > --- Alex > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joel Jaeggli >> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2020 11:45 AM >> To: draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org >> Subject: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR verfication request >> >> Authors, Contributors, WG, >> >> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call: >> >> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? >> >> Please state either: >> >> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" >> or >> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" >> >> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs >> 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? >> >> If yes to the above, please state either: >> >> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" >> or >> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" >> >> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. >> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above >> by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any >> relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response >> has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS >> APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. >> >> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an >> author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR >> rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others >> on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or >> discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see >> the RFCs listed above and >> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftrac.to >> ols.ietf.org%2Fgroup%2Fiesg%2Ftrac%2Fwiki%2FIntellectualProperty&dat >> a=02%7C01%7Calex%40futurewei.com%7C48a1503b85ce4447c93008d7b3e1d >> 732%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637175654901969 >> 545&sdata=2AeUnZCMLnT4c34lcAQ0j4PAjb%2F%2BwAavkLfcXvptQv4%3 >> D&reserved=0. >> >> Thank you, >> NetMod WG Chairs >> >> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response. >> >
- [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR verfic… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR ve… Alexander Clemm
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR ve… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR ve… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR ve… Yingzhen Qu
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR ve… Joel Jaeggli