[netmod] 6991bis - Any plans to add more URI Syntax components?
Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Sat, 28 September 2019 01:39 UTC
Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5F5120026 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zQvk2PM8EkSv for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E178012000F for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id t14so4358291pgs.3 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=SgngeLEyX9347U1X/XwjsOhPORBWiDT2fxNdwVPTEN4=; b=pFveykXTplTso0V573/BNqHJmSJbtSY/24pHwfOfShgB305wGbQqYrP/l9VbcrXi0U Dw2+1cmj8GHGx/uUR6nD0G8BvyQSFFRo6EyRJp2yDOITTzjcrVaUOo/l5arSW2LzMegD j9Z2u61sDcfUWzRhwA/GsFIlqreQrFbL77+A0AgJxLhDQYsm+4A9eFLoWoG/IW7h4pm7 cjHExBCNxTX4iLP0iUe7fLsVeEjqVUew217qcYyi/SOxU/5WCrQUZnc4oc1Y/BbWh4wl SGzoXOhSGGzlpkZXDkuQYMEXsZhcETZbaV6rEss+L9Y4pg74aPPli+ax7VjaaZ6eIMIT L4IQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=SgngeLEyX9347U1X/XwjsOhPORBWiDT2fxNdwVPTEN4=; b=unYjZxkhz9g9cBSwqMIuOqRRk1BjLrbIAqkU5znCi3CSfCrXmC0mUWujBVuExRhWA8 gUUJgcceZWmVqPbT37cr0VQ4vonUyu7zaFoFij1J698s6N5kwHR1LOXCNeBgQDZK9fQJ wt27PhA5LTg6KyZ13333mln/Gt1KIkDqb9mmVCkE8c1Gobuy+aeOKomvXvb8mc62lCPp YQtgB3z3NOa5kb7O5PGOmcjke0c8pHKDzBp4xTARETa0a830SOmEO8ipQXfJ33Eu95MZ DjmXwUZ90SYCLy5LB5uhJIz7LVshAKKJJx1rFqWxEvnTdXasNhBSWXIn+llPqAkJk5lx u44Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVSrqJMMMOZyymH6jO6H2KmmFm/a8bZZU8GOsgb2dLpPS1P2awF ozh/rlAhTSWSOf9m+M4hHwuGUYDYHeM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzs3B4KsE7iAkTx0Q9XrEEqv/K1JZZIAKVw5e01IQRPKLplADADBL4vPZ8JFrpcSNFvvGNG9A==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:1888:: with SMTP id 130mr8072006pfy.72.1569634795998; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5600:5020:8966:a5ac:204d:e8de? ([2601:647:5600:5020:8966:a5ac:204d:e8de]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z12sm4195076pfj.41.2019.09.27.18.39.55 for <netmod@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D6B9C177-6744-4715-999B-2C4F2EB8FE58"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Message-Id: <8F6D6E58-CCB2-4404-AFB1-876EBE5721E7@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:39:54 -0700
To: netmod <netmod@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/lpN4MZz-82XFpGIODBSyJhxFoms>
Subject: [netmod] 6991bis - Any plans to add more URI Syntax components?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 01:39:59 -0000
Hi Juergen, Is there a plan to add more URI syntax components in rfc6991bis? I know there is a typedef for uri, but I was looking specifically for the following that are defined in RFC 3986. Scheme Authority field including User information Path Query Fragment Thanks. Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanandani@gmail.com
- [netmod] 6991bis - Any plans to add more URI Synt… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] 6991bis - Any plans to add more URI … Schönwälder
- Re: [netmod] 6991bis - Any plans to add more URI … Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] 6991bis - Any plans to add more URI … Schönwälder
- Re: [netmod] 6991bis - Any plans to add more URI … Mahesh Jethanandani