Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07
Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Thu, 21 December 2017 13:08 UTC
Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCE21276AF; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 05:08:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XfeSh3tkOi02; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 05:08:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from trail.lhotka.name (trail.lhotka.name [77.48.224.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD90127978; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 05:07:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by trail.lhotka.name (Postfix, from userid 109) id CA026182040F; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:07:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (nat-2.nic.cz [217.31.205.2]) by trail.lhotka.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FA9018203F5; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:07:37 +0100 (CET)
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, andy@yumaworks.com
Cc: netmod-chairs@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20171219.212514.769253397796153677.mbj@tail-f.com>
References: <80a900b3-716a-b11f-3472-7cae57662ba4@labn.net> <CABCOCHSPxEG+eXx5arHhMbxNMxgdCRKoe25Rv3-qXJ0QmVRMZw@mail.gmail.com> <20171219.212514.769253397796153677.mbj@tail-f.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, andy@yumaworks.com, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:07:55 +0100
Message-ID: <87d138kz4k.fsf@nic.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/lxISvrUSsCyWanLzA5YiHoIhrpU>
Subject: Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:08:06 -0000
Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> writes: > Hi Andy, > > Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have reviewed draft-07 and my previous comments about NMDA have been >> addressed. >> >> This might be the most important sentence in the draft: >> >> sec. 5.3 >> >> The datastore schema for <operational> MUST be a superset of the >> combined datastore schema used in all configuration datastores except >> that YANG nodes supported in a configuration datastore MAY be omitted >> from <operational> if a server is not able to accurately report them. >> >> The MUST implies that there is no need to design a YANG library that can >> support >> an implementation that violates this MUST (i.e., 1 schema tree for the >> super-set) >> >> The MAY is troublesome because it completely contradicts the conformance >> expressed >> in each YANG module supported by the server. Any data node without any >> if-feature-stmts is mandatory to implement. > > This is required for transition purposes; a server that wants to > implement <operational> should not have to implement all modules at > once (as applied config). > >> What about config=false subtrees within a config=true subtree? >> Can they be omitted from <operational> as well, or does the draft just >> intend to >> omit the operational value of config=true nodes? Should be specific. > > The text says "nodes supported in a configuration datastore MAY be > omitted from <operational>". So it is implicit that it only applies > to config true nodes (since config false cannot be supported in a > config ds). How about: > > OLD: > > The datastore schema for <operational> MUST be a superset of the > combined datastore schema used in all configuration datastores except > that YANG nodes supported in a configuration datastore MAY be omitted > from <operational> if a server is not able to accurately report them. > > NEW: > > The datastore schema for <operational> MUST be a superset of the > combined datastore schema used in all configuration datastores > except that YANG "config true" nodes supported in a configuration If this is about schema or data nodes, I suggest to state it explicitly: ... "config true" schema/data nodes ... > datastore MAY be omitted from <operational> if a server is not > able to accurately report them. > > >> Perhaps this draft does not need the MAY half of the sentence at all. >> The YANG library can specify that it is for conformance-reporting, not >> conformance-defining. > > I think we should keep the MAY, since the YANG library has to be > designed to support this case. Shouldn't the server add corresponding deviations to the schema for <operational> in this case? Lada > > > /martin > > > > >> >> >> >> >> Andy >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote: >> >> > All, >> > >> > This starts a second working group last call on >> > draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores. >> > >> > As this is a 2nd LC that is focused on changes since the last LC, it >> > closes in *one* week. The working group last call ends on December 11. >> > Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list. >> > >> > At this point, we're most interested in verifying that previous comments >> > are addressed since the last call on the -04 rev of the draft was held. >> > >> > A summary of changes can be found at >> > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/DWtD12bGkBZabEygRfiwZfcnUU4 >> > >> > A diff can be found at >> > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url1=draft-ietf-netmod- >> > revised-datastores-04.txt&url2=draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-07.txt >> > >> > Comments along the of: I have reviewed this version of the document and it >> > addresses my previous comments would be particularly helpful. >> > >> > Thank you, >> > Netmod Chairs >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > netmod mailing list >> > netmod@ietf.org >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
- [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-i… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-i… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-i… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-i… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-i… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-i… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-i… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-i… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-i… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-i… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-i… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-i… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-i… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-i… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] *one* week 2nd WG Last Call: draft-i… Martin Bjorklund