Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
From: Robert Wilton <[email-masked]>
To: Martin Bjorklund <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:36:13 +0100
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>

On 04/10/2018 11:14, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Phil Shafer <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> Bal?zs Lengyel writes:
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
>> [I've moved to a "deep lurker" role here, but ...]
>>
>> Can we ensure this model contains a "format" leaf in the RPC's input
>> so that future (and proprietary) formats can be supported?   That
>> leaf can be an identityref that defaults to yang-patch.
> I think this is a good idea.  I would prefer the edit-config format
> over YANG patch for describing a diff.  The edit-config format is more
> suited for this purpose imo.
+1

I would like something closer to edit-config to be available via 
RESTCONF as well.

Thanks,
Rob

>
>
> /martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> .
>