Re: [netmod] draft netmod charter update proposal

[Robert Wilton <[e-mail]>]

On 27/02/2017 21:41, Lou Berger wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
>
> On 2/27/2017 3:31 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>>
>>> Hi Kent, Lou,
>>>
>>> I think that it might possibly be a good idea to please align the
>>> timelines for:
>>>
>>>    draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang
>>>    draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-yang
>>>
>>> because I think that it will be somewhat helpful to review both
>>> documents together.
>> Can you provide dates you think we can commit to?
>>
>>
>>> Also, I just wanted to confirm that the datastore work is covered by
>>> this text:
>>>
>>>     c) Maintaining a conceptual framework in which YANG models are used.
>>>        This effort entails describing the context that network management
>>>        protocols (e.g., NETCONF, RESTCONF, CoAP, etc.) operate in, and
>>>        how certain YANG statements interact in that context.
>> Yes indeed, or at least, that was the intention.  Here "conceptual framework"
>> and "context" are meant to be more all-encompassing than just the datastores
>> effort.  Makes sense, or needs clarification?
> Does this help?
>
>    c) Maintaining a conceptual framework in which YANG models are
>       used.  This effort entails describing the generic context in
>       which YANG exists and how certain YANG statements interact in
>       that context. An example of this is YANG's relationship with
>       datastores.
Yes, I think that this text is better.

Thanks,
Rob


>
> Lou
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kent // co-chair
>>
>>
>>
>>
> .
>