Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

[joel jaeggli <[e-mail]>]

On 9/26/18 09:23, Andy Bierman wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:09 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder
> <[e-mail]
> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

> 
> It is even worse than a step backwards.
> The draft specifies a lot of details about module tag conformance
> that needs to be present in the description-stmt.

this seems like an important issue to square away  before we  move ahead.

> The idea that tools must screen-scrape description statements goes against
> everything YANG-based management is all about. YANG has extension
> statements, so we don't need to put complex syntax into comments and
> descriptions..

and parse descriptions for meaning.

> IMO all text about module tag conformance and defining tags in
> description-stmts
> should be removed.  There is no explanation why a standard YANG module
> would define multiple module-tags for the same module in the first place,
> let alone why each different tag would have different conformance
> requirements.
> 
>  
> 
>     .....
> 
>     /js
> 
> 
> Andy
>  
> 
> 
>     -- 
>     Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
>     Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
>     Fax:   [phone]         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>