Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Thu, 15 February 2018 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7FA12AF84; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:03:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-VX5glVv7dJ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:03:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2E74129C56; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:03:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=12709; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1518714215; x=1519923815; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=PS8060EmCJ1i+3pThgrT4hHiRz9KjQVWG6NeoaUjQBg=; b=OXWVKSEo99PIUjS2nw7cA1feaiRP+pZS0Vcm4p14PtdCkCUe2pAKt1Y+ WNE0Kjdh+C6+cX2VN8pa3zv9R3Q5R+kO/iPmA38CIvbj1PlQ5xLojR4nt BmG1LNXFcqEVPaUDIkPmtgMET+AHicHIZjuZEXdmcyAjVFMSU9h+zP4Fi w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A/AQAivIVa/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJagV5wKINliiV0jxKBF5BphVyCGAoYAQmESk8CgxYYAQIBAQEBAQECaygJBYUWAQEEAQEhSxsLDgonAwICJx8RBgEMBgIBAYoxEK5KgicmhFuDe4ITAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWFA4N+ghGDBYMvAQEBARmBNgEBgzWCZQWaKYoJCYggjWWCH4Yqg3Mmh2SOBYF+iBmBPB85gVEzGggbFT2CRoIcgltBNwEBAYt8gj4BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,517,1511827200"; d="scan'208,217";a="2092842"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Feb 2018 17:03:32 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.94] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-94.cisco.com [10.63.23.94]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w1FH3W6w010199; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:03:32 GMT
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, NETCONF WG <netconf@ietf.org>, NETMOD WG <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <F10CE657-FC6B-491B-A8DF-0CFEE98B863C@gmail.com> <4a6b7077-a721-6d09-b594-44f9760e58a1@cisco.com> <14390982-A1C2-40E5-AEA1-B03B02E8ACEC@juniper.net>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <3d3d9e35-b9f5-aefb-a291-a25549ed9ad5@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:03:32 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <14390982-A1C2-40E5-AEA1-B03B02E8ACEC@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------F409F3EC81B75D9D6E5612CD"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/nBijGI2kqLiGvudrW0ktQamN82o>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:03:38 -0000

I should add, as a contributor, I have read this document and think that 
is ready for advancement.

I have three minor comments:

1) module "feature" in YANG library is a leaf-list, but currently it is 
a list in YANG libary bis. I suspect that this is due to one of the 
incarnations when it contained additional information.  I think that we 
should revert it back to being a leaf list for consistency.

2) Lada recommended that module "deviation" be made a leaf-list. I also 
support changing this for consistency with "feature" above, but don't 
feel too strongly on this one.

3) I think the "modules" list is also allowed to included modules that 
don't actually contain any nodes that require implementation.  Hence, it 
might be useful of the "modules" description statement explicitly stated 
this.  I.e. perhaps something like:

"This list may contain modules that do not contain any schema nodes that 
require implementation.  For example, it could contain a module that 
only defines types and not any data nodes, RPCs, actions, notifications, 
or deviations."

Thanks,
Rob


On 02/02/2018 13:51, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> As co-author, I am not aware of any IPR related to this document.
>
> As a contributor, I have read this document and think that it is ready 
> for advancement.
>
> Kent
>
> On 2/2/18, 4:30 AM, "Netconf on behalf of Robert Wilton" 
> <netconf-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf 
> of rwilton@cisco.com <mailto:rwilton@cisco.com>> wrote:
>
> I am not aware of any IPR related to this document.
>
> Thanks,
> Rob
>
> On 01/02/2018 18:59, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
>
>     WG,
>
>     The authors of rfc7895bis have indicated that they believe the
>     document is ready for LC[1].
>
>     This starts a two week LC on the draft
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dietf-2Dnetconf-2Drfc7895bis-2D04&d=DwMD-g&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=fi_opjj4kio7eufRXSQSi8dSjJNlkVDo8a1F0zsCrfE&s=MqbVljnYqIk9w78kcfp7oUqGR-qVoNV90njyTwLAdpc&e=>.
>     The LC will end on February 15.
>
>     Please send your comments on this thread. Reviews of the document,
>     and statement of support are particularly helpful to the authors.
>     If you have concerns about the document, please state those too.
>
>     Authors please indicate if you are aware of any IPR on the document.
>
>     Thanks.
>
>     [1]
>     https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/current/msg13980.html
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mail-2Darchive_web_netconf_current_msg13980.html&d=DwMD-g&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=fi_opjj4kio7eufRXSQSi8dSjJNlkVDo8a1F0zsCrfE&s=XhRSSTWifO-SkPi2CWK5Z5aUni2F1qRQ8Moj7T7gI-Y&e=>
>
>     Mahesh & Kent
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Netconf mailing list
>
>     Netconf@ietf.org <mailto:Netconf@ietf.org>
>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netconf&d=DwMD-g&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=fi_opjj4kio7eufRXSQSi8dSjJNlkVDo8a1F0zsCrfE&s=mcDF-v5I4epgsuWLHvr32pZ5mRonROKN8zpKcZWBC0o&e=>
>
>
>