Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 18 December 2017 12:54 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3644126CBF; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:54:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.631
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aTwLr_ZfvZuA; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:54:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27B34120727; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:54:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4070; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1513601690; x=1514811290; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=IzigOWqOu+mj+Bu6sPjkQcks6Npr3ZcLh03GDZa7oFw=; b=UX8tGUnTlyKnXP2gbDu+lA+d6dbVTcJt40v3lCGQpuoLqxaje9d3mL+p 7OWkoqyb2PCJlqxWL6UDzM4u6HVkBmdBNCsreaPNeGvYJGyE/hPd32Nri pZJLMwy/lEzZq+gKUHPdeXsvUMR6djfwzjCrVNLe+xi/Z/GJ9AG/1LsaJ g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CoAAA2ujda/4gNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYM+ZnQnB4N/iiGPCIIAlyGCFQoYC4RJTwIahGs/GAEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAWsohSQBAQQBASEROgsQAgEIGAICJgICAiULFRACBAENBYoqEKoTgieKZwEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgQ+CX4IOgz+DLIMuARiBVheCfoJjBaM8Aod?= =?us-ascii?q?9jS2CFoYTi0qKTYJOiTACERkBgToBHzmBT28VPIIphFZ4AYkAgRUBAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,422,1508803200"; d="scan'208";a="333493505"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 18 Dec 2017 12:54:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBICsmbF005561 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:54:49 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:54:47 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:54:48 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Vladimir Vassilev <vladimir@transpacket.com>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
CC: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01
Thread-Index: AQHTdecPhSAo6kKOv0CHaR8SVGCwjKNHxIIAgAGI84D//8VpgA==
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:54:48 +0000
Message-ID: <D65D246E.E2FE0%acee@cisco.com>
References: <8568e55c-29c6-272e-dd9f-7d1b150edba6@labn.net> <44e5318a-4157-b825-b688-5185ab2458cb@labn.net> <D65C0ACB.E2B1E%acee@cisco.com> <43f78a5f-9485-05cc-dd11-2ff29ced6120@transpacket.com>
In-Reply-To: <43f78a5f-9485-05cc-dd11-2ff29ced6120@transpacket.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <87585530BDFEDD40990D3F506093C32E@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/nIL5p2DDu0dp5WXtLEQrdYhdZsI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:54:51 -0000

Hi Vladimir, 

On 12/18/17, 6:24 AM, "Vladimir Vassilev" <vladimir@transpacket.com>; wrote:

>
>
>On 12/17/2017 05:57 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>> Hi Lou, et al,
>>
>> The only issue we are struggling with is whether we need to specify the
>> version in the ietf-interfaces import. We have noted that
>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01.txt does not import by revision.
>>
>> We also have so nits:
>>
>>     1. Add an informative reference for
>> [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams].
>>     2. Based on a comment from Vladimir, we added the prefix for
>> ietf-routing.yang, “rt:”, to several references within
>>ietf-routing.yang.
>> Was this necessary? Of course, the model compiles with or without the
>> prefix.
>I reverted this in a follow-up comment on the same thread. I believe the
>local prefixes are redundant.

I’d already updated the git repository and neglected to revert it. I will
revert after reviewing RFC6087BIS rules.

Thanks,
Acee

>
>Vladimir
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>>
>> On 12/15/17, 3:55 PM, "netmod on behalf of Lou Berger"
>> <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of lberger@labn.net>; wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>> 	This last call is closed.
>>>
>>> We note that there was an update during the LC and that no comments
>>>were
>>> received during the LC period.  As this is simply a mechanical update
>>> that has been discussed in the WG we plan to proceed with the
>>> publication process.
>>>
>>> Authors,
>>> 	Please let/us the WG know when you have published a version ready for
>>> publication.  Also please let the WG know what has changed in the
>>> document since the start of LC (rev -01)
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> NetMod Chairs
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/29/2017 12:26 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> This starts a two-week working group last call on
>>>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01.
>>>>
>>>> Please recall that this update's intention is to
>>>> modify the YANG module to be in line with the NMDA
>>>> guidelines [1].  Reviewing the diff between the two
>>>> drafts [2] should reveal just this.
>>>>
>>>> The working group last call ends on December 13.
>>>> Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list.
>>>>
>>>> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
>>>> and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
>>>> This is useful and important, even from authors.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01
>>>> [2]
>>>> 
>>>>https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url1=rfc8022.txt&url2=
>>>>dr
>>>> aft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01.txt
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Netmod Chairs
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>