Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01

Hi Vladimir, 

On 12/18/17, 6:24 AM, "Vladimir Vassilev" <vladimir@transpacket.com> wrote:

>
>
>On 12/17/2017 05:57 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>> Hi Lou, et al,
>>
>> The only issue we are struggling with is whether we need to specify the
>> version in the ietf-interfaces import. We have noted that
>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01.txt does not import by revision.
>>
>> We also have so nits:
>>
>>     1. Add an informative reference for
>> [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams].
>>     2. Based on a comment from Vladimir, we added the prefix for
>> ietf-routing.yang, “rt:”, to several references within
>>ietf-routing.yang.
>> Was this necessary? Of course, the model compiles with or without the
>> prefix.
>I reverted this in a follow-up comment on the same thread. I believe the
>local prefixes are redundant.

I’d already updated the git repository and neglected to revert it. I will
revert after reviewing RFC6087BIS rules.

Thanks,
Acee

>
>Vladimir
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>>
>> On 12/15/17, 3:55 PM, "netmod on behalf of Lou Berger"
>> <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of lberger@labn.net> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>> 	This last call is closed.
>>>
>>> We note that there was an update during the LC and that no comments
>>>were
>>> received during the LC period.  As this is simply a mechanical update
>>> that has been discussed in the WG we plan to proceed with the
>>> publication process.
>>>
>>> Authors,
>>> 	Please let/us the WG know when you have published a version ready for
>>> publication.  Also please let the WG know what has changed in the
>>> document since the start of LC (rev -01)
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> NetMod Chairs
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/29/2017 12:26 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> This starts a two-week working group last call on
>>>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01.
>>>>
>>>> Please recall that this update's intention is to
>>>> modify the YANG module to be in line with the NMDA
>>>> guidelines [1].  Reviewing the diff between the two
>>>> drafts [2] should reveal just this.
>>>>
>>>> The working group last call ends on December 13.
>>>> Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list.
>>>>
>>>> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
>>>> and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
>>>> This is useful and important, even from authors.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01
>>>> [2]
>>>> 
>>>>https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url1=rfc8022.txt&url2=
>>>>dr
>>>> aft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01.txt
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Netmod Chairs
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>