Re: [netmod] FW: Schema Mount Yang Library Update

[Ladislav Lhotka <[e-mail]>]

Hi Rohit,

I am sorry that nobody answered your question, but I don't feel
competent to do so because I don't like the way how the "shared-schema"
case is currently modeled in the first place. 

Lada

Rohit R Ranade <[e-mail]> writes:

> Hi Authors,
>
> Any suggestions regarding the question in the below mail ?
>
> With Regards,
> Rohit
>
> From: Rohit R Ranade
> Sent: 28 December 2018 09:37
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: Schema Mount Yang Library Update
>
> Hi All,
>
> For the shared-schema type, the draft mentions "all instances of the same mount point MUST have the same YANG library content identifier".
>
> I think to achieve above condition, most vendors will plan to have only one YANG library instance for that mount-point.
>
> If use multiple instances for Yang library, it is possible that the algorithm may generate a new content identifier for same data as per below statement in Yang library 1.1 draft:
>
> "There is no requirement that the same information always results in the same "content-id" value."
>
>
> If use single instance of Yang library, when a YANG library update happens, for which mount-point instance should a YANG library update notification be sent ?
> What is the guideline for the implementers of this draft regarding this point?
>
> With Regards,
> Rohit

-- 
Ladislav Lhotka
Head, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67