IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] A reworking of RFC8343

tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Tue, 22 October 2019 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2701C1201DE for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 04:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RATWARE_MS_HASH=2.148, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BsUzX_zCvRRX for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 04:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr70114.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.7.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 313D61201C6 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 04:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=n2TG/IbVo13pLWSvi0nQBV0CeJXmHqpmGlf/gN1QJy9Jm7bvbAbTHAPRR6P8QEUcTCmpgSO9/BfS11JuBxw8PsXd3bE2BvjsyQ4Vponuu9kZ449ER7CMz+R5l2SjZbxRBBq9EHfQsxFhm9BG8hznV61BlxuwXm2bfPejIWCGjzlx13RDB0x9bu9Ki5LoQ/YDCDZ/RgosZz3PkAxb6Rx90vJay39wSiCaC7JTLTXvJqsGqRHWlX5aJPoCOwFPXOZHyfFOHkxJXkkthYX7h5YV0SmP9lbHtuJyOvNYH0sanMivF2ZS3cVv84NdDGg9MHfvHRtbjB53UssNC67BGaKrNQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=hvEs6V4VyqKMjl/886OTGEtXlibn57gvJjUeqzDobY0=; b=HTSgizjD7OLI7gfdUPdoPjrbqkLxYXsCgWTbFqWLnVqQbpBz1e3WPsHDnNnjVS0h+6syTWQtZTocZHJkLRCQpu6KAqb8cucXNo/xVIkBdJpQ0fleNvfeOaVza0uD5ZF764O2cuD8mSdRIV7fJbGfNEzs1c+DQJxBdT66SJ9cZCbehPAbB7t9FvHPF+p6bmD5bDnVUGcgLjDLoxSmg8ZgBM1jxr+xfEAyd7h6QdcvvjbAy9lmexevryyY/kwM9sD6n4OJ+m8h/+RH9ZMoUWDwN5Y2doELjxfvnw2kAzrE8k6fzRP9uT305+Kunz534Dp9Qp66hjj+nQJ7mghoHpKx1A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=hvEs6V4VyqKMjl/886OTGEtXlibn57gvJjUeqzDobY0=; b=dc2yA1HRLBmTx2ZwlnEhGaHdFT6XS7AOtyxP/0A/wwOsm48MN/g05CcI33pJb/sbJ+07RPGUAmCj4q68/DEVvkyn4Y/uTZil13JsCmDCFHhFSgZiPtdlU7VwVVHqSTtRVz/3Ji7kMX4hgrX5CwcetNkQzHsiCG9t8bBUJsv1Gwk=
Received: from DB7PR07MB5147.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.178.42.32) by DB7PR07MB5833.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.178.106.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2387.14; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:59:51 +0000
Received: from DB7PR07MB5147.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::99a:1592:683a:ab85]) by DB7PR07MB5147.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::99a:1592:683a:ab85%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2387.016; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:59:51 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
CC: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: A reworking of RFC8343
Thread-Index: AQHViNA1MlB1UPEqz0qCHhj4HYGYig==
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:59:51 +0000
Message-ID: <0a0401d588cf$dd0e3000$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <8736fmtk3d.fsf@nic.cz><20191021.134014.40553165389352172.mbj@tail-f.com><039001d588c2$bb3d7e20$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20191022.133131.983827662033885262.mbj@tail-f.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: LO2P265CA0309.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:a5::33) To DB7PR07MB5147.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:68::32)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ietfc@btconnect.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
x-originating-ip: [86.139.211.103]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 75b799cd-9a7c-4ae0-2c36-08d756e75815
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB7PR07MB5833:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB7PR07MB5833B1D586AB99D64830DC07A0680@DB7PR07MB5833.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:2089;
x-forefront-prvs: 01986AE76B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(396003)(366004)(13464003)(189003)(199004)(52116002)(186003)(446003)(1556002)(62236002)(25786009)(76176011)(99286004)(305945005)(229853002)(81816011)(44716002)(81686011)(8936002)(7736002)(81156014)(44736005)(6486002)(8676002)(81166006)(6436002)(66476007)(86362001)(64756008)(66556008)(66446008)(4720700003)(476003)(66946007)(6916009)(486006)(14496001)(26005)(386003)(6116002)(3846002)(316002)(71190400001)(102836004)(71200400001)(50226002)(2906002)(14454004)(4326008)(6246003)(478600001)(66066001)(61296003)(5660300002)(256004)(6506007)(9686003)(6512007)(74416001)(7726001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB7PR07MB5833; H:DB7PR07MB5147.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: /K7hKzTQMIUS3Gm0C+qIbrRq4I3urHIpDIk1W0Bw9fvf4AGSZ5NSHshT9H7P4PqA6h/TyCxxcUqwSvInzvJFLILA3IOGnciMF8PXMf3DKY/bWAITG1DPXL9FikSJB5BUo97xw5iwbVbQjygshtuywPjddJORTRsj71Wq417xW2Mw9v+yLI0HMGWdssahCKcDucrHn5Bcsso9uJmrrimdtUcaGEpmSums2dCEQvDD771MJUH89Q5cxLnp5+bgramN9bFFzr7sBsE369ztopZWvVzCChhSILbLBn7xLeI0gRvecYyRZ457/3PODsHkYZac9suaRKY18U/TXHCIE4wN/rZ9H4JDPNlSEC0NXBk5XqVsgxF3DFbanbB4FI+9UITBakSBKm7d/XlJpsBuUubbIxEA0rjTTRdN22w1y5QZXWiTQBkrrOjML7tzEGJrd4Wc
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <3D8AB27B0805B844B49BF4A7652BE47A@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 75b799cd-9a7c-4ae0-2c36-08d756e75815
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Oct 2019 11:59:51.3040 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: eFaEP1FNm/peeP7HLty4VQt1/R1pmpps6xAU0KagI8YKlVhaYVgubgGaRWhzX9CMzil1edOQSIY9dAxifsizHg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR07MB5833
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/nrHYwDwOW_Os4aGcd39pz5guWpg>
Subject: Re: [netmod] A reworking of RFC8343
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:59:56 -0000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Bjorklund" <mbj@tail-f.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 12:31 PM

> tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> wrote:
> > Martin
> >
> > I am wondering how much you know about a module that says
> >       WG List:  <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
> >       Editor:   Martin Bjorklund
> >                 <mailto:mbj@tail-f.com>";
> >
> > The module is
> >   module ietf-ucpe-interfaces {
> > in
> >   draft-shytyi-opsawg-vysm-04
>
> Haha!  I don't know anything about it.
>
> > The author appears to have taken RFC8343, changed the module and
prefix
> > name (but not the Editor) and added, at the top level,
> >    augment "/ietf-vysm:ucpe" {
> > (ucpe also appears in this I-D).  I have commented on the OPSAWG
list
> > about this approach not being one I have seen before and the
response is
> > that the yang validator is fine with it.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Clearly unacceptable.  Unclear why a ucpe can't implement
> ietf-interfaces from 8343.
>
> > An earlier version of this module had
> >   import tailf-ncs
> > which also had me wondering.
>
> Hmm.

Martin

Thanks for that; I was rather thinking that that was the case:-)

Tom Petch

> /martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email