Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Mon, 25 March 2019 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D538120115 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q7Mf_ewJvCzi for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4CEC120005 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id b7so2607077lfg.9 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iU8egfBVTeMe9u0YMm8F4YDB9zRdmTMsXuJqfuDxV6s=; b=GD2cOtpJ85fslCmm+Uqh7GsmZqs5GedAIcC+4fxgyaaTlPxRbi8Sl0gQrMujMPy7ly +UTzZTX4yl36AnLKRL1A/ZnDLpLGhddzN6sQybv19bAKiRbsH+cknTkr90hq+wt7goPj fWykamO5yAH62Q1YJ5xwTnTPmzIC6wrOBDLb/EhMdtLW+2VP09B6lD7+TtYUnVXiMT+B 2HavJNeVeX3myrwBY0x54qeWxFcwP66QXSr2USH+ZVbp0TKf9uqMcmmUv+vbFsFuFSJG x3dkKexktzaFwapH0aUaoAu28/4mqqKE0aXfQ59ffrb2Uz/VcTuUK8OXFm4IIM0DTVL+ BWJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iU8egfBVTeMe9u0YMm8F4YDB9zRdmTMsXuJqfuDxV6s=; b=RvTvhw4w7JuQSv7mksUfIC12YBZzIQujspEGMznvNoYkObqeqJ1D0nnmbvm7TBuc7B i/1EN23PDJ6BwmMBnI+ZUy03h5DNoMGsLc/GR3jhtZssmGP+wm5XPjtn12PH7b/espqh rTs8wEuHt+N9MkaH9VAY/k7k+NuXuiQptutCmzkdzMRJn0TBX1OJTq80cUkYVjpIpgA/ ZnkAGif6Dx85XjQ7DGLlcuWLKW/kAMcntnIrZtgvQbtdvO2RlVKDFYXW+4h5GpsT8EFZ JmV7zdLjHlUnmJzeRAirIEwZEfFcgC3gOZSPjR4ue2sIgC/7p6RmbOBMs8w4Mj14Shcr GpMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUUZPAK9YxGS3KQ8dfIl6J0z9ulurz/2X5pnuFyJdpfT+XzR1M3 gP3I+ZZssQj4kKH+6PeRbiVwnNpuIprnKOtiXtBoxA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwoejQRjiqn9tMyRZt+oj6VuAqcOndpxgH6IOEtvziUwqSailJLg84wvDCq8IghhGSCLiwbTzzojlpW266KVC0=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:489a:: with SMTP id x26mr1263300lfc.49.1553551859893; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <01000169b69032d0-ca63f6e6-7c28-46ad-b0bc-d47b72d4e118-000000@email.amazonses.com>
In-Reply-To: <01000169b69032d0-ca63f6e6-7c28-46ad-b0bc-d47b72d4e118-000000@email.amazonses.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:10:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHT2-iBjtcjigOueQqnGJCJgAd28hhe=dYGA77fgAbXU4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Cc: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bfdf3a0584f27a9d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/nzs9pQRJtml1zf3N1qcnLnkDzRs>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 22:11:05 -0000

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:35 PM Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>; wrote:

> This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:
>
>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02
>
> Please voice your support or objections before April 8.
>
>

I have significant concerns about this draft and work item.
The intentions are good and the scope is well-defined.
The problem is that this is a very proprietary implementation detail.

I have already raised the issue that our server cannot factory reset a
single datastore.
It can only do that for the whole server (which will setup the datastores
in an implementation manner and order). So another RPC is needed, and
if-features.

I have seen some comments on this issue: "This is great but our server
does not work that way, so we need X,Y,Z"  (Just like I am doing ;-)
How will the WG keep that from happening 10 or 30 times?

I support this work if the WG can figure out how to keep it simple.
(Meaning I support adoption of the work but not going to wait 2+ years for
it)


Kent (and Lou)
>

Andy


> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>