Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll
Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Tue, 09 October 2018 10:58 UTC
Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220CB131280; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 03:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XiATsrW4DzPT; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 03:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21F013127B; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 03:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.61]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD1A81AE0428; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 12:58:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 12:58:22 +0200
Message-Id: <20181009.125822.1764836266889190398.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: lberger@labn.net
Cc: netmod@ietf.org, netmod-chairs@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <b8f163ea-ea33-53a6-3fac-944b8d6c03ec@labn.net>
References: <b8f163ea-ea33-53a6-3fac-944b8d6c03ec@labn.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/oUo0OzeESF6uj4oGyE-q7U1lK_g>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 10:58:27 -0000
Hi, I still think that this draft should either be split into two, one for specifiying the generic file format (ok with examples), and one for "Documenting Server Capabilities", or the document should just be about the file format (+ *examples*). [The current document mixes the two; it's a bit as if we had "The YANG language and a model for interfaces" as one doc...] It is clear that the document specifies a file format for YANG instance data, which is good. But it is not clear if the document intends to specify how a server should document its capabilities. The Introduction mainly talks about why it is important to document server capabilities. But then AFAICT there is no normative specification of how a server would document its capabilities. /martin Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04 a working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or > "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reservations > with the document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments > you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. > > The poll ends Oct 22. > > Thanks, > > Lou (and co-chairs) > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
- [netmod] WG adoption poll Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll Alexander Clemm
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll Xufeng Liu
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll Tianran Zhou
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - draft-lengyel-net… Balázs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - instance-data Balázs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll Joe Clarke
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - instance-data Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - instance-data Balázs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - instance-data Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll Susan Hares
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - instance-data Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - instance-data Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - instance-data Balazs Lengyel
- [netmod] Server Capabilities [was: Re: WG adoptio… Balázs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll (draft-lengyel-netm… Lou Berger