IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netmod] Question on "bits" in YANG

Sampathkumar Santhanakrishnan <sampathkumar.santhanakrishnan@ericsson.com> Thu, 25 February 2016 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <sampathkumar.santhanakrishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC91D1B3150 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:49:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nGyH72Jz8n0m for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:48:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usplmg21.ericsson.net (usplmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3195B1B3145 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:48:57 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c6180641-f799c6d000007d66-29-56cf4c7d5230
Received: from EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.75]) by usplmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 42.79.32102.D7C4FC65; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:48:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB109.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.126]) by EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:48:55 -0500
From: Sampathkumar Santhanakrishnan <sampathkumar.santhanakrishnan@ericsson.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Question on "bits" in YANG
Thread-Index: AdFvp4yPrlpBi+eWRxun0pzcY5uwwQ==
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:48:52 +0000
Message-ID: <5ADC40FCE0FC7140AB4B8FD107A271C4219E9580@eusaamb109.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5ADC40FCE0FC7140AB4B8FD107A271C4219E9580eusaamb109erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXSPt26tz/kwgz/rzSzmX2xkdWD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxvelrUwF30Qr5r49ydzAuEG4i5GDQ0LAROLq1YIuRk4gU0zi wr31bF2MXBxCAkcYJW4tOMcO4SxnlFjZ0scGUsUmECQx7+9iFhBbREBdYubO9WBxYQFliVV9 /cwQcQ2Jrt2vmSBsPYm9rYfZQWwWAVWJC98msoLYvAK+Es+uzAerYRSQlfjSuBqsl1lAXOLW E4i4hICAxJI955khbFGJl4//sULYShKTlp5jBXmAWSBf4vkcXYiRghInZz5hmcAoNAvJpFkI VbOQVEGU6Egs2P2JDcLWlli28DUzjH3mwGMmZPEFjOyrGDlKiwtyctONDDcxAoP+mASb4w7G vb2ehxgFOBiVeHg3/D0bJsSaWFZcmXuIUYKDWUmEN8zrfJgQb0piZVVqUX58UWlOavEhRmkO FiVx3rnO68OEBNITS1KzU1MLUotgskwcnFINjGrzVRVOzVz3ZtntnxMbv77eEtLadDeEdWlK aM75H5VTTt9W4J7qHCQZ9uj2hJlCTEIrPu9/r3rBP4dtSk6z1I8ZIXs7L2zjX88hPr2+b7Zx Tde+D1/ftE4VXlDxmO2X7xmNx/NeXJJb+UrB1YbL8eQClhvuLgujeXXOnf2vuXy6mvLDDzu9 LXWUWIozEg21mIuKEwGaj/sXdgIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/oZ_s7CP9fPcDT8R9rZMJLiEZfjY>
Subject: [netmod] Question on "bits" in YANG
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:49:00 -0000

Hello,
I have a question on "bits" type in YANG. Does it make sense to use "bits" in "config:false" attributes ?
As per my understanding in the read-only uses cases, the bits "position" is not much useful. Please clarify.

Thanks & Regards,
Sampath

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email