IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5157)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 16 October 2017 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EBF134563 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IxLwMSN42HAz for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13A2413456C for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5FA26B80E0F; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
To: mbj@tail-f.com, bclaise@cisco.com, warren@kumari.net, kwatsen@juniper.net, lberger@labn.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: andy@yumaworks.com, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20171016190431.5FA26B80E0F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:04:31 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/p8rB56-WyYy8Q9DliGveT5ZTF5s>
Subject: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5157)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 19:04:52 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950,
"The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5157

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>

Section: 14

Original Text
-------------
  key-predicate-expr  = node-identifier *WSP "=" *WSP quoted-string

Corrected Text
--------------
  key-predicate-expr  = node-identifier *WSP "=" *WSP 
        (quoted-string / integer-value / decimal-value)

Notes
-----
An instance identifier is forced to specify every key value to be a string
even though the YANG key leaf type could be a numeric type.
XPath does not require a quoted string here, just YANG.

Old:  /top/list[idx="4"]
New: /top/list[idx=4]

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language
Publication Date    : August 2016
Author(s)           : M. Bjorklund, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : NETCONF Data Modeling Language
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email