Re: [netmod] 6087bis

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Shawn Emery reviewed draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-10 and made this
> > editorial comment:
> >
> > OLD:
> >
> > These are the subtrees and data nodes and their
> sensitivity/vulnerability:
> >
> > NEW:
> >
> > The following should be considered for subtrees/data nodes and their
> > corresponding sensitivity/vulnerability:
> >
>

I do not think the new text is better.
I think 6087bis is already stuck waiting for AD approval for a tiny change
to the security template.

> > However, the OLD fomulation comes from RFC 6087, so perhaps this change
> > should be applied in draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis in the first
> > place. The NEW formulation indeed looks better to me.
>
> What is the WG's opinion on this proposed text change?  6087bis is in
> AUTH48 so if it needs to be changed it must happen now.
>
> Of course, we can update
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines even when
> 6087bis has been published.
>
> If we don't want to update the template, I don't think we should
> update the schema mount draft either.
>
>
> /martin
>
>
>
Andy

>
>
> >
> > Lada
> >
> > --
> > Ladislav Lhotka
> > Head, CZ.NIC Labs
> > PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > netmod@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>

Re: [netmod] 6087bis - Security Considerations template