Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@huawei.com> Mon, 08 October 2018 21:05 UTC
Return-Path: <alexander.clemm@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351CE130E96 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 14:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7dIllUibCUgD for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 14:05:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 730D4130F49 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 14:05:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 6C18C11C108D; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 22:05:15 +0100 (IST)
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.40) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.399.0; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 22:05:16 +0100
Received: from SJCEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.47]) by SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.60]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 14:05:10 -0700
From: Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@huawei.com>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
Thread-Index: AQHUWyQUI2nNckn+1ky1f4oa9l5TQKUPVRSAgAAnqICAAARaAIAABz8AgABBFoCAAAiTAIAAGC0AgAAFdICAAAvggIAAw7yAgAUeeMA=
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 21:05:09 +0000
Message-ID: <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0EB6D575@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <201810031419.w93EJNpn040188@idle.juniper.net> <20181004.121417.2190375850946168105.mbj@tail-f.com> <69afa537-9a5f-6fb6-de21-2add0ffec4b2@cisco.com> <0aa239221e80e812f920db6ae023eabc6b3ef5ed.camel@nic.cz> <ccc83277-cfa7-f363-1beb-78e801f8b675@cisco.com> <27c125fa83754c5f6723e04243f1efdaf4be8e82.camel@nic.cz> <7E46B2E3-3F12-4E08-8172-823E73E25D50@juniper.net> <20181004190754.fsu5ck5jblw5uuah@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <CABCOCHTu5ju8Qv548g+mDNioBAAuxRywZknoNO9mbUOY3MaoGw@mail.gmail.com> <8704A29D-EBAB-4AA0-B5A3-3CAC74403360@juniper.net> <87sh1kde7u.fsf@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <87sh1kde7u.fsf@nic.cz>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.193.35.91]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/pWKv7xnH6WMff9_0bJcIuLklUDI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 21:05:24 -0000
I would second the request for one format (which is mandatory to support), which must be specified. YANG-Patch is the logical candidate IMHO. To allow selection of other formats using an input parameter makes sense, but adds some complexity from there: How to know which formats are supported? (Add a list of supported formats somewhere?) Or simply rely on augmentation for those implementations that want it? --- Alex > -----Original Message----- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ladislav Lhotka > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2018 12:50 AM > To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>; Andy Bierman > <andy@yumaworks.com>; Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs- > university.de>; netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > > Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> writes: > > > Sure, one mandatory to implement format, others nice to have. > > Interoperability good. Agreed. > > > > But why YANG-patch and not something built for the purpose (e.g., > > YANG-diff) that, in particular, provides an actual diff as opposed to > > a data-tree operation that only shows one of the two values? > > Such a format can be developed independently, I would support it. > > Lada > > > > > Kent // contributor > > > > > > On 10/4/18, 3:27 PM, "Andy Bierman" > <andy@yumaworks.com<mailto:andy@yumaworks.com>> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:07 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de<mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs- > university.de>> wrote: > > Folks, the more formats there are, the less interoperability we get. > > If there are multiple formats, is there a mandatory to implement > > format? Does the mandatory to implement format depend on the protocol > > that is being used? > > > > I prefer one format or if necessary I am fine with one mandatory to > > implement format. An open ended collection of implementation specific > > formats is super flexible but defeats the purpose of a standard, > > namely interoperability. > > > > I agree there needs to be 1 mandatory-to-implement format. > > > > IMO this needs to be YANG Patch because it is more precise then > > constructing an XML tree with operation attributes in it (e.g., how > > else do you represent a delete or a move?) Also, YANG Push is using > > YANG Patch format and common code for push and diff would be possible. > > > > I think other formats should be allowed. > > This is very tool-specific. I could see how somebody might want a > > textual patch of the XML representation to produce the new XML > representation. > > > > > > /js > > > > Andy > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:41:22PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote: > >> We agree that the diff-format should be client-selectable, modulo what the > server supports. yang-patch and edit-config both are viable. Should we > document them both? > >> > >> That said, since neither edit-config nor yang-patch are diffing formats, so > much as formats for converting one data tree to another, would it make sense > to define an actual diffing format? I would think that a diff would provide both > values, not just a new value. > >> > >> Kent // contributor > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: netmod > >> <netmod-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf > >> of Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz<mailto:lhotka@nic.cz>> > >> Organization: CZ.NIC > >> Date: Thursday, October 4, 2018 at 1:11 PM > >> To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com<mailto:rwilton@cisco.com>>, > >> "netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>" > >> <netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>> > >> Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for > >> draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > >> > >> On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 14:17 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote: > >> > > >> > On 04/10/2018 13:51, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> > > On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 13:36 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote: > >> > > > On 04/10/2018 11:14, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >> > > > > Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net<mailto:phil@juniper.net>> wrote: > >> > > > > > Bal?zs Lengyel writes: > >> > > > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tool > >> > > > > > > s.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dclemm-2Dnetmod-2Dnmda-2Ddiff-2D00 > >> > > > > > > &d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK- > ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r > >> > > > > > > > =9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=7s6VdzzH9O > >> > > > > > > > l3BOCbVLBarBrQ5fD0vTt8k_I2KDEN97c&s=gQWJtjc_2EF3QgRvABgZK > >> > > > > > > sjqzuIw9yUq_xee6aFJOcw&e= > >> > > > > > [I've moved to a "deep lurker" role here, but ...] > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Can we ensure this model contains a "format" leaf in the RPC's input > >> > > > > > so that future (and proprietary) formats can be supported? That > >> > > > > > leaf can be an identityref that defaults to yang-patch. > >> > > > > I think this is a good idea. I would prefer the edit-config > >> > > > > format over YANG patch for describing a diff. The > >> > > > > edit-config format is more suited for this purpose imo. > >> > > > +1 > >> > > > > >> > > > I would like something closer to edit-config to be available > >> > > > via RESTCONF as well. > >> > > YANG Patch is IMO better because it clearly separates the target > >> > > for the edits from the new content. > >> > > In edit-config these two are mixed together. > >> > Yes, that is primarily why I prefer the edit-config. I perceive > >> > that it is a denser and more efficient format. I think that it is > >> > both easier to construct (when diffing two trees) and also more > >> > efficient to apply when generating an updated tree. > >> > >> Except for certain corner cases, for example if two trees differ only > >> in the value of a single leaf but this leaf happens to be a list key. > >> > >> Lada > >> > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Rob > >> > > >> > > >> > > That being said, I support specifying format/media-type and > >> > > having potentially multiple options. > >> > > > >> > > Lada > >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, > >> > > > Rob > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > /martin > >> > > > > > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > > > netmod mailing list > >> > > > > netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org> > >> > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf > >> > > > > > .org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0U > >> > > > > jBXeMK- > ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjIS > >> > > > > > laJdcZo&m=7s6VdzzH9Ol3BOCbVLBarBrQ5fD0vTt8k_I2KDEN97c&s=RVJcg > >> > > > > 5pzHW-zi1OboCL4SX2huW9euHiVRSCor9n_APQ&e= > >> > > > > . > >> > > > > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > > netmod mailing list > >> > > > netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org> > >> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.o > >> > > > > rg_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXe > >> > > > MK- > ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZ > >> > > > > o&m=7s6VdzzH9Ol3BOCbVLBarBrQ5fD0vTt8k_I2KDEN97c&s=RVJcg5pzHW-zi > >> > > > 1OboCL4SX2huW9euHiVRSCor9n_APQ&e= > >> -- > >> Ladislav Lhotka > >> Head, CZ.NIC Labs > >> PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> netmod mailing list > >> netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org> > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mai > >> lman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK- > ndb3voDTX > >> > cWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=7s6VdzzH9Ol3 > BO > >> CbVLBarBrQ5fD0vTt8k_I2KDEN97c&s=RVJcg5pzHW- > zi1OboCL4SX2huW9euHiVRSCor > >> 9n_APQ&e= > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> netmod mailing list > >> netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org> > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod<https://urldefense.proof > >> point.com/v2/url?u=https- > 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=D > >> wMFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK- > ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9E > >> PoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=O7d- > b9gyPvsasJo1ueKk3doDH7f5S5WQLo8_W6 > >> W3qt4&s=5LHhbfQZeoqYlC40T3mm-AEz4rSsyRWYjqTK7LuWTPw&e=> > > > > -- > > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs- > university.de/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- > 3A__www.jacobs- > 2Duniversity.de_&d=DwMFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK- > ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=O > 7d- > b9gyPvsasJo1ueKk3doDH7f5S5WQLo8_W6W3qt4&s=zh7qEPSmwviaSqZBqG1Gc > qItXwI9pwyqIFVW6xC8rK8&e=>> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod<https://urldefense.proofp > > oint.com/v2/url?u=https- > 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwM > > FaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK- > ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoO > > H7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=O7d- > b9gyPvsasJo1ueKk3doDH7f5S5WQLo8_W6W3qt > > 4&s=5LHhbfQZeoqYlC40T3mm-AEz4rSsyRWYjqTK7LuWTPw&e=> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > netmod@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > -- > Ladislav Lhotka > Head, CZ.NIC Labs > PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
- [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Alexander Clemm
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Qin Wu
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Yingzhen Qu
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Susan Hares
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Balázs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Phil Shafer
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Alexander Clemm
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Susan Hares
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Alexander Clemm
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-net… Alexander Clemm