Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the module be implemented?
Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Tue, 24 May 2022 14:28 UTC
Return-Path: <01000180f677da49-d1b20894-b244-4f2c-93ea-001aff1e86b0-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21BCC15EB52 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2022 07:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6qkuvzGEiixn for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2022 07:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a8-88.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-88.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7EB0C180A8B for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2022 07:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=6gbrjpgwjskckoa6a5zn6fwqkn67xbtw; d=amazonses.com; t=1653402491; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=NtGa+D0fTTO4uvzaTU4/lxtO2gWGP+Mc/8FF3kIGQYk=; b=h5Sgi+cFAXFFkOdA9E0YFwl6XvE/cJx82rd/gNPgpF1A7MC5qcFWkP0WmhbvkYwO ru8rKSO5UKhANAUoO+HK8hz+gc82fH0eJqICiLy83Dq+4lK0n4x1l+M+7g+uAQMpn2m w1QGL+FF0nLUesfU939qXW+Dkpet+/3MkbK1uU94=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <01000180f677da49-d1b20894-b244-4f2c-93ea-001aff1e86b0-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8FA6E125-7CE9-4EBE-8950-A9193A85C851"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 14:28:11 +0000
In-Reply-To: <87ilpvo36s.fsf@nic.cz>
Cc: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz>
References: <01000180a9eb37cb-85b9c576-c1eb-425a-b42c-b3cabe548fbb-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20220518.080543.825575420363032441.id@4668.se> <01000180d793d6ee-f82a4a03-28d8-4f8b-909e-7306a7fc565b-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20220519.090452.636208001533389643.id@4668.se> <CABCOCHQMregbZwY0vOZbYkjwzzPp-JHjDK3tWcVnw_fj3+zv8w@mail.gmail.com> <01000180e19bcd37-22dd5fc0-b39b-4d92-ab51-7bbbfbe653e1-000000@email.amazonses.com> <CABCOCHR_pb4JSpjFA0PAX2a4bybkVxu9xRx=AxRkWs9QVFC9Qg@mail.gmail.com> <01000180f1350b6f-2eb3399c-dbcb-4103-9458-63d9822722bc-000000@email.amazonses.com> <87ilpvo36s.fsf@nic.cz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2022.05.24-54.240.8.88
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/q9OsUhMkDws4Kx5IyEJoN3fxNMI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the module be implemented?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 14:28:13 -0000
Hi Lada, > But the alternative behaviour exists as well. I don't think this can be fixed by an erratum. Please say some more. Are you referring to now-obsolete RFC 7895? What does Yangson support? K.
- [netmod] Does defining a feature require the modu… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Michal Vasko
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Robert Varga
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Martin Björklund
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Jan Lindblad
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Martin Björklund
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Robert Varga
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] Does defining a feature require the … Robert Varga