[netmod] Schedule Model: Your comments at IETF#119/TVR

[[e-mail]]

Hi Erik,

At TVR@IETF119, you raised the following comment (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-119-tvr-202403200300/)

==
Erik Kline: sldie 5, timezones makes everything worse. datetime start is
bad name. call it "utc start time". interval vs duration?

possibly going to be removed, working with schedule authors for specific
grouping for tvr

Erik Kline: If you want to recurr make the control system do it if want
to make truly simple. so remove that from model.
===

We updated the common module to address the comments about use explicit names for utc groupings + clarify interval vs. duration). The changes can be seen at https://netmod-wg.github.io/schedule-yang/draft-ietf-netmod-schedule-yang.html#name-the-recurrence-utc-grouping. These changes will be inherited by the TVR spec.

I'm not sure to understand the last part of your comment above. I would appreciate if you can clarify. Thanks.

Cheers,
Med

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.