[netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: (with COMMENT)

"Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 02 November 2016 10:53 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147808398811.24141.15196130392409336719.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 03:53:08 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/qMV0c2Q89tXpeGGixHsoMRANkYQ>
Cc: netmod-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg.all@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
Subject: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


If there exists a draft for a yang module that augments this
in a way that includes cryptographic values (e.g. maybe for an
IPsec VPN or something) then I think that'd be a nice addition
to section 11 as an informative reference.

[netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-… Stephen Farrell
Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dr… Ladislav Lhotka
Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dr… Stephen Farrell
Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dr… Acee Lindem (acee)