Re: [netmod] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-21

"Gary Wu (garywu)" <garywu@cisco.com> Wed, 21 February 2018 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <garywu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA1912DA00; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:37:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IUqJskvJUtt0; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:37:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E115A12DA1D; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:37:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1808; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1519245421; x=1520455021; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=WXNGGiIfiNCdrGywNQVNJQUf/9bX4u82iohtJCX5KOo=; b=XDjD5Dq8WY3+X8UMDd8hnDc5/4b6jMEacEEBzq25g3Iljh2xMreLUSCs vMtL5U/b5IoVCcvqMT7Sfk9p5gvuKdiphBFQm2wn/39m7ONBuWCVlAi3y H/YoGpl2pb3Mpt8NDuwXUVnOG7gNQFejkHjYCW88NR6KjxiZIjFbm7TLv 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BHAQAH2I1a/4wNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNPgVYyg16KJY14ggKBF5ZKghYKhTQCGoJeVBgBAgEBAQEBAQJrKIUkAQQBIxFFEAIBCBoCJgICAjAVEAIEAQ2KIAiqe4IniHuCEwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2BD4QCgieBV4IQgwWIOjGCNAWkOwkClguCIIpAh2WLGYxgAhEZAYE7AR85gVFwFWQBghmEdYxzgRkBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,375,1515456000"; d="scan'208";a="73489533"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Feb 2018 20:37:00 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (xch-aln-013.cisco.com [173.36.7.23]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w1LKaxt9018594 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:36:59 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-006.cisco.com (173.37.102.16) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:36:59 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-006.cisco.com ([173.37.102.16]) by XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com ([173.37.102.16]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:36:59 -0600
From: "Gary Wu (garywu)" <garywu@cisco.com>
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>, "Clyde Wildes (cwildes)" <cwildes@cisco.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model.all@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-21
Thread-Index: AQHTqcT/Wj6TPTms9Eu/1STZVbhb16OsuqUAgAJ3uQA=
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:36:59 +0000
Message-ID: <F936D2F4-2D71-4B8E-B800-3E162D1B7B03@cisco.com>
References: <151896425742.27914.9664814474838013064@ietfa.amsl.com> <6E582464-6EDB-4D55-9E8B-BEC68929DF9A@cisco.com> <4694018c-0be5-e78c-38ed-8745da01d019@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4694018c-0be5-e78c-38ed-8745da01d019@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.131.51]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <6F6AA6C010300849A02D2268154E6B88@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/qT2TBUgWzoTXez-rpJkJUr-RoaQ>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-21
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:37:03 -0000

    >      Security Comments
    >      
    >      * I think almost all writable data nodes here are sensitive, because a network
    >      attacker's first move is to block any logging on the host, and many of the data
    >      nodes here can be used for this purpose.
    > 
    > [clw1] I will reword the security section to include all writeable nodes as sensitive.
    > 
    >      * Re: readable data nodes, I'm not
    >      sure which are sensitive, and the document should give an example or two rather
    >      than just say "some". Otherwise the security advice is not actionable. One
    >      example: "remote" sections leak information about other hosts in the network.
    > 
    > [clw1] This text was lifted from another model. I will review the readable nodes and update.
    > 
    >      * Write operations... can have a negative effect on network operations. - I would
    >      add "and on network security", because logs are often used to detect security
    >      breaches.
    > 
    > [clw1] I will add this phrase.
    > 

The fact that the syslog data nodes are write-sensitive can be made explicit in
the model by making the whole configuration tree nacm:default-deny-write, and
making read-sensitive subtrees nacm:default-deny-all.

Thanks,
Gary Wu