Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03

Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com> Sun, 15 October 2017 08:50 UTC

Return-Path: <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35631132A89 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 01:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fbZF3b6_mdBD for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 01:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 101BF13263F for <netmod@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 01:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO LHREML713-CAH.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DQR01900; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 08:49:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.40) by LHREML713-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 09:49:56 +0100
Received: from SJCEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.102]) by SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.104]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 01:49:43 -0700
From: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03
Thread-Index: AQHTREUx6dfZtzUXzkCdAPj9I2IarqLknH+g
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 08:49:43 +0000
Message-ID: <594D005A3CB0724DB547CF3E9A9E810BF1FE78@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <D60669F5.CEA65%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D60669F5.CEA65%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.212.245.141]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020201.59E32135.004D, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.1.102, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 73b32041fdc40ca513124528d90ee22b
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/qfnhHBM7ETtoY8JappobjL6CjP4>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 08:50:01 -0000

As co-author, I support and am not aware of any IPR.

Thanks,
Yingzhen

-----Original Message-----
From: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 10:04 AM
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>et>; netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03

As co-author, I support and am not aware of any IPR.
Thanks,
acee 

On 10/13/17, 10:37 AM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen"
<netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:

>All,
>
>Now that we have resolved the module naming issue on the list (i.e.
>that keeps the original rfc module names and updates the unwanted 
>legacy nodes to have status 'obsolete'), rather than wait for the 
>changes to be made in the individual document, we'd like to move ahead 
>with the adoption now, with the understanding that these changes will 
>be made in the -01 version of the adopted draft.
>
>This is start of a two-week poll on making 
>draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03 a working group document.  Please send 
>email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".  If 
>indicating no, please state your reservations with the document.  If 
>yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see 
>addressed once the document is a WG document.
>
>The poll ends Oct 27.
>
>Thanks,
>Kent (and Lou)
>
>_______________________________________________
>netmod mailing list
>netmod@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod