Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-04 duplicaiton
"t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com> Wed, 13 September 2017 16:44 UTC
Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76B713306A; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y3fwq7bamAKC; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-ve1eur01on0109.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.1.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 099311326FE; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-btconnect-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=+XDdzeVjOK5qFk5vr/GSfW0S9SBqudP9q/oCToZ6rGU=; b=apyetCvfwKNtOBUri9gy5TEnKkKQsebvArPBHpBrjSDiOdgLB27RYKzKu97X+d3p0mfHf2rn9uUDQPynCRYAw0BsQX3T3uN7bKdEOzDoYtQ2rYD5fHZHknfbyN6IMX8Q5+FWIVdlVNDHPN6abEZ3svu3lm1QvpytmePNh+Z8XD4=
Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ietfc@btconnect.com;
Received: from pc6 (86.185.245.5) by AM5PR0701MB2995.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:203:48::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.56.4; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:44:07 +0000
Message-ID: <00bd01d32caf$4eb28e60$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, netmod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Cc: netmod-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores@ietf.org
References: <511deba5-34ca-dde2-6637-ceaf4c4af125@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:42:30 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [86.185.245.5]
X-ClientProxiedBy: AM3PR07CA0106.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:207:7::16) To AM5PR0701MB2995.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:203:48::17)
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 35e20f18-3f8d-4bc2-18e2-08d4fac6a6de
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(300000500095)(300135000095)(300000501095)(300135300095)(22001)(300000502095)(300135100095)(2017030254152)(300000503095)(300135400095)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(300000504095)(300135200095)(300000505095)(300135600095)(300000506095)(300135500095); SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2995;
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; AM5PR0701MB2995; 3:x0FoEDJbSHcKvCPUfwz2hIcJFgHkF9cRj7EDCNuRIupHhHZxASfRUmj/v1HnDagpyQoxpGDfh8fXrEE2wwjsJFV66eqsk52aMc1w9+78pLeB/cQyw3MpvCl8RctpQFnLwbbfUo+QsQ4BVCN7uuwGpdyskDYIzJVg2N93zBIqTTosyJAg/y7vTpszDtwFWW/H4doxHUNVmfQU2xA6f4fyZ2xiL2UcJOiFIzZ8poDzvcMYuF5s6c050HgFLl1atCJn; 25:Ksv/D47yFmMFEV2RrXm1SH+aA7ICxJp/94n9FfQETIPQ+G4q1LdqYnBHJiwKv4QXFqwBuEo5KwoAfG6np712uvQ4UnXpAoa34legjuD9jJY7JZf346ngktQ1MFEyQPwHMoz1PtHisIPT0Iko71xTEow7w3M0HvVrpmC3ceXTL88Lv2tDoG/6db+QXhUEKThv6zwvtmE47pQiNc41RRgk35ddR0/eOkJAeCYWGnbtZDFO+jtb3Uh6TtGppkL+szN2GJvENx6yJy/e6RxX3+SfD9ehwaZsEXhiM1w2pfkHYNlO8h3PnIIETbaMGUu8GZI9vMU8PZ7FOW4JHeWDw7/t8w==; 31:DvJz7czDBDklFQromv1wbdnapShyggM/No8KBB+A8sFJUR4dFL60MmyDK3UcGeG19OyQKBOv9X0ttcF9rXcbkMGNr80KLy1ehczuwlSJAekppQcuZk3gqH83tO8yZOKn7BcwgdU2XEhhFXDn514azPwfr4m956V2oldObmwBDMWBJrMKyS1hJ8rw9AhneICoLEQ6iUc0ENkeBw8Yxz2a6vR//z+hNOXlP+e7ekwhfyQ=
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: AM5PR0701MB2995:
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; AM5PR0701MB2995; 20:Idp+WryxFpOUOJFTuOsV4lvzoUXu0h2cFzyQWSoeaCAHSsNdEw1yaFnN/7Fo1SaQc9FaXe1vBJYYQqWAuDFjGt0n2GTJ7/VXlv1ubjsqmYaXR1z/S/JeNDqsf72/3qdqqDW8CNHrOzxTVb3MQGOzjAfadeyUZT46u1HJmGeWZP/D8YWz9Jd64oiAffgAC7N52+xL38iM2CT4T4b8L6JKSveDd/4paIPKYpv3Q8g3MB8r86ty2tDYVMkKAK2k3ooV; 4:q50Rujcy3am1qCHDvMrSXyvUyglX7WwA1MFFTlDDoQLkL6xj1mLsa0Gp/yBrUH1eTXjtQH9Gralo1qPRiDXYl+wBPqfzjbk60MpingYDoIcVB8H9Z4a/g8/n7QS+o9s85ZiwZp1pi83eaYkp+Xk5TAkTK6n7t6giJltxfn6eLEz8F59PSKzRb79nmOrW16QHIltZx0C1bEMS38zYE+jaLsmLxfIIPmcpwj64oqsELKCX4HSWkb4NWl2AnkpErHT9
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <AM5PR0701MB299595CC94565B8E5C20A333A06E0@AM5PR0701MB2995.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(100000703101)(100105400095)(6041248)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123558100)(20161123560025)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2995; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2995;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 042957ACD7
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(7370300001)(4630300001)(6009001)(376002)(39860400002)(366002)(346002)(189002)(377454003)(51444003)(199003)(13464003)(3846002)(6306002)(54906002)(23756003)(7736002)(478600001)(50986999)(101416001)(76176999)(81686999)(81816999)(105586002)(6116002)(106356001)(61296003)(966005)(81166006)(50226002)(9686003)(305945005)(81156014)(8676002)(62236002)(66066001)(44716002)(316002)(33646002)(47776003)(68736007)(97736004)(25786009)(84392002)(230783001)(116806002)(4720700003)(86362001)(44736005)(7350300001)(6666003)(5660300001)(4326008)(229853002)(1556002)(230700001)(2906002)(6246003)(53936002)(1456003)(14496001)(6496005)(6486002)(50466002)(189998001)(74416001)(7726001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2995; H:pc6; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en;
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; AM5PR0701MB2995; 23: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
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; AM5PR0701MB2995; 6:rINoaOvZz34DO0DJR2n0Phf1ynjg+CKAnjSzFz2SR9ex6pxnE6bBO1rgB4jI90tkw7k3EY9aelPSJxY49Ly1C+oUHlzDi8sWSAdLOuaXM716aYr7Vk+1/Ii2VzzqeC4T13Mp4Yb1xpQlP2LOR+M/eySW5DOYA0f3qjqCIpZqUTPYgtN3E7PSHJPjyq7SvrD7d9mtWm3wJtbcsEN29VaEKQXRHE/KWxGl7SDZFqLWuXeQB+PUIjIC2rWh+DjwMZsYVvVxZD1ftmRUBdQUiCbQ3Mz57iPJIFEcXTHLDv8EEWcaBFUZ5bsgh8e8k+CQ4hepRYInVtL4KxvvmLSvUgJEsQ==; 5:PG6Q1ZSJjkuoaGML8JJiArR19sLPn6S2EFK+w6RuY8VI/Iff9DsUdXdzsOEK5Mg8xsqdS0uu1mSbikKr9iwjIC+hd9Yr6xPf5pG+ZKncVngK3xsp00vh9fSHVLoYGsK/hfrxznx/5EoVdox0S8Z5fg==; 24:waK+mUjvsIET993E0VySBDH84TM7R8Mg6WCCDGtAUQdXwe5Ixfy7RWIZo7zVM4OJ36AIQEp2BDc9vVA0GpjG8I/TURe5AQWaGZghZsP3w/I=; 7:ZI0wrJAtihYVDjs4UkV4JI34pOEFpdvlZKKFOcoovtEvag5HcKWJpI4LI8tqKgqJcaLbBUksQYljHWuaByf8bYjAByK20ca8a9ldTpkjpg3zos7P8cNlt8ftKWOizofKf5p+q4WxIhz7bgwfi0O++xGsIoRONHPjfzx+ODe3RVYjLeJjvbF8C3h4UMwLOUKZEFEkWAKc6oWRouwkCpd3BQka0Exsa31KnXJURVgxMFs=
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Sep 2017 16:44:07.3155 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5PR0701MB2995
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/rCezDmJlzSF0vt7rlDxSGKfqTI0>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-04 duplicaiton
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:44:14 -0000
I think that in one respect, perhaps the key respect, this I-D fails to state the obvious (or at least what is likely obvious to those who have been at this for a while:-). The problem that is hinted at but never explicitly stated is that data objects can appear both as configuration and as state, e.g. when learned by other means or at other times. The original model of datastores required these data objects to be modelled twice, as configuration false and as configuration true, and since there could be many of them, and the rules of YANG require them to be in separate trees, this led to a twin-trees approach such as can be seen in RFC7277 or RFC7223. Amongst other problems, this separation of operational state from configuration in a separate branch in the data model has been found to be operationally complicated and impacts the readability of module definitions. The relationship between the branches is not machine readable and filter expressions operating on configuration and on related operational state are different. With revised datastores, there is a single data object to model both values but this now appears in two datastores, one for the configuration value, one for the operational state value. Instead of two YANG data nodes there is one data node in two datastores, a more elegant and simpler solution to the problem. I believe that text such as this would make the I-D much easier to follow. As it stands, you have to read between the lines and speculate. Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lou Berger" <lberger@labn.net> To: "netmod WG" <netmod@ietf.org> Cc: <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>; <draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores@ietf.org> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2017 10:02 PM > All, > > This starts a two week working group last call on > draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-04. > > The working group last call ends on September 17. > Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list. > > Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and > believe it is ready for publication", are welcome! > This is useful and important, even from authors. > > Thank you, > Netmod Chairs > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
- [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… t.petch
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Phil Shafer
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… t.petch
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… t.petch
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… t.petch
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… t.petch
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Phil Shafer
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Phil Shafer
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… t.petch
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… t.petch
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Martin Bjorklund
- [netmod] <running> vs <intended> [was Re: WG Last… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> [was Re: WG … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> [was Re: WG … Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> [was Re: WG … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> [was Re: WG … Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> [was Re: WG … Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> [was Re: WG … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… t.petch
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> t.petch
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> Robert Wilton
- [netmod] RFC 2119 language [was Re: WG Last Call:… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] RFC 2119 language [was Re: WG Last C… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] RFC 2119 language Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] RFC 2119 language [was Re: WG Last C… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] RFC 2119 language [was Re: WG Last C… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] RFC 2119 language [was Re: WG Last C… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] RFC 2119 language [was Re: WG Last C… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] RFC 2119 language [was Re: WG Last C… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] RFC 2119 language [was Re: WG Last C… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] RFC 2119 language [was Re: WG Last C… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> t.petch
- Re: [netmod] <running> vs <intended> Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revi… Robert Wilton