Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09.txt

Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> Thu, 03 October 2019 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC5E1200B6 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 08:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F2wleqBoXrBA for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 08:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.chopps.org (smtp.chopps.org [54.88.81.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8AF1200B5 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 08:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stubbs.int.chopps.org (unknown [172.222.100.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp.chopps.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 397806057A; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:59:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
Message-Id: <643E9707-383F-4700-B206-6EAFEA0332F7@chopps.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E955A673-B7B5-4C6A-937B-53DDDF141D53"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:59:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB43667363225E96A99C755036B59F0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
References: <156942813583.28879.894232837346561087@ietfa.amsl.com> <8F9EDBC3-EB9C-452E-9091-03DBBC735CAB@chopps.org> <MN2PR11MB43662800E2F593864E130468B59F0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <4ED3E9FA-9B58-4E9C-AA88-CFF4260A9E90@chopps.org> <MN2PR11MB43667363225E96A99C755036B59F0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/rWUc3TJJpW_QLwwEwPUSpEpZKdo>
Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09.txt
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 15:59:20 -0000

> On Oct 3, 2019, at 11:30 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Chris,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
>> Sent: 03 October 2019 16:16
>> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>
>> Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>rg>; netmod@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-09.txt
>> 
>> [resending to include list cc]
>> 
>>> On Oct 3, 2019, at 5:45 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Chris,
>>> 
>>> As discussed offline, you have left out the "masked-tag" container in
>> the "modules-tags-state" module.
>> 
>> One might read this as an objection that was discussed offline, but I
>> don't think you are objecting, you're just stating what happened, correct?
> 
> Correct, not objecting, although I might be about to šŸ˜‰
> 
> Generally, I think that is what is available in "module-tags-state" should be directly equivalent to what is available in the operational datastore for servers that support NMDA.

So is this how we're supposed to construct these deprecated state modules, just copy all config true and config false nodes into a new module and mark them all config false? If so fine. I will do that.

Thanks,
Chris.