[netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23
Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> Fri, 02 March 2018 20:33 UTC
Return-Path: <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECB8126C25 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 12:33:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umich.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id krRLv-iLgmPD for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 12:33:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com (mail-lf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3A7812D7F1 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 12:33:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id h127so14037426lfg.12 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 12:33:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google-2016-06-03; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=FWtyepIfwsljLqgWWrPGnaNqj3Qh50dG6NWWkzu2yz0=; b=LLx7xqZ3xE+7Gla4CoqFL7mf7zNn68lggeiLT6f0A8TLPLB9FFIT9IbNYV5o1/GzGk 9+C3hE/nmBi7oSB8IGTrvr+5sLHUQPr2sRPs5FLDCjwJ02sddEMJ70vGwD6bz7tqKNHx KPgyb4jwA/sTYofMH+vhnxxBz4RvtpQYd5147AFo1H15UWP3WuDVy+3/drwCONVLT4ee G6Z7JSXi4YujvGPZOwOqoboEXsRtn7Fsag7X1+XTkjN6IUAeyZ9k9GIdgwKsqCoZ/Jlf IGSDWaw3aGRPZ16Lp9bbrCXQIVnAS5nI+CSUhek2MWCQbP3NfSBBmA65+mCtDZenSu5F Vb+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=FWtyepIfwsljLqgWWrPGnaNqj3Qh50dG6NWWkzu2yz0=; b=Lwdi462R78j6ImCZCgkuSVcNzTg4m//uPBXiFPgV8Cd0gnh5sFRZersUnZijJsvW+h Bvfo8K9AgksBZbbJyEuWDvbWmA0Z/4bUqBbPuzp8SzIWFtX0/6IgPTAtUQByCWwXHFl4 RvyH+1pZbxqKJ6y5RuBgxMtLOIh3fEWKPPGIELPMVnRkjd6py1rAYXFyRSDZzhRqMivH 2DnATV7HveXKoGURahF4AHqr3aEKI8npX1ZRpMk3xJuR3dtrIk6/8F6dOgv1kpddgmpa TzqR+pIhZtrCt13fh6y+R62gXioz0Zfv8wAzx0BLiVSzfPkKh3OOK7QUPqRH5z5qew7H jXjw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7Er+stPreo+MCuSGGj14Bh6ad2cO45y8MvJ2mVl3gbjZNO397m1 2F7LGEjAxGvgKVEMUpW/UjGpghhyXD7I0LEqQzRpBvbN
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvmNB05KYvBZV8UF9WB86bfS67qGTTbvJWrRM+descuZaPqn62CtyxivPZmYonrf6qAvt4YvLk9ftkGPYMjOT4=
X-Received: by 10.46.88.27 with SMTP id m27mr4685285ljb.132.1520022781614; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 12:33:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.18.21 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 12:33:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 15:33:00 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+nkc8BUwyn=9=YVJCZwJB10dH2rwmvPShdS8yShLDuu5PzwgQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: netmod@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043871c4f2f6f4056673e1b5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/rdHXYyKyTRjb1jSiy0p-YB5f3Ks>
Subject: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 20:33:06 -0000
Sorry for being late to the discussion - just joined this group.
Can we have "higher severity" match "higher number" in the enumerated
values, to avoid confusion?
In section 4.1. The ietf-syslog Module
on Page 11
typedef syslog-severity {
-- should be in the order:
debug=0
emergency=7
because "severity-filter" uses "equals-or-higher" which means "higher
severity" but should also mean "higher number" to avoid confusion.
--
Bob Harold
- [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23 Bob Harold
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23 Clyde Wildes (cwildes)
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23 Bob Harold
- Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23 Clyde Wildes (cwildes)