Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5663)

Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk> Tue, 19 March 2019 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <nite@hq.sk>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B2C129A86 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hq.sk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x58aS_FkH7Co for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hq.sk (hq.sk [81.89.59.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 428311277E5 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nitebug.nitenet.local (chello085216197060.chello.sk [85.216.197.60]) by mail.hq.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFD4C241860; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 23:27:59 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hq.sk; s=mail; t=1553034480; bh=46UFpF0wcafKYKeRjozoMsPEC/u2DOoZIiOSrDsHwrM=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=FsPsLS+z6HfgOAy9Us6mQVCg9KPNioDj9kMVguIJI7IfiEYAioESIGNcEo05gy2cd /37E2OeY6hOQbipZGic47YLzvVKX3Avc9SMDf7jPZoguGz30Q+JG6WNicCJZiXY5X2 a6eydBQxezpL4Llrfy8usx/asnzgt83sIwtebYdk=
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "mbj@tail-f.com" <mbj@tail-f.com>, "ibagdona@gmail.com" <ibagdona@gmail.com>, "warren@kumari.net" <warren@kumari.net>, "joelja@bogus.com" <joelja@bogus.com>, "kent+ietf@watsen.net" <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, "lberger@labn.net" <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <20190318181542.0F0ABB826EA@rfc-editor.org> <d6158ad52bc94f9697bd064493c5bf47@XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com>
From: Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <f77efd55-81d8-9745-fae8-73f213c4eba3@hq.sk>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 23:27:58 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d6158ad52bc94f9697bd064493c5bf47@XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/sMjyFxx6MzSei8F4kaLA5bEH-wI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5663)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 22:28:06 -0000

On 19/03/2019 19:12, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
> Hi Ebben,
> 
> I've always taken the ABNF to list the definitive sub-statements that are allowed for the various deviate "add", "replace", or "delete" options.  Perhaps the RFC could state this more explicitly.  Perhaps raise an issue on the YANG Next issue tracker to clarify this (https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues) and it might get discussed tomorrow.

I agree.

Proposed statements are simple cases, for which 'deviate replace' can be
used to specify the correct value -- for example remove 'min-elements'
by replacing it with 'min-elements 0'.

Regards,
Robert