Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

Hi Martin,

Several comments on the YANG model within rfc7223bis.

list interface {
        key "name";
        description
          "The list of interfaces on the device.  The status of an interface is available in this list in the
           operational state...

A few questions on this.
(a) The description of the list defines behaviors of various list nodes which might or might not exist in different NMDA datastores.  It also suggests when certain elements should be populated in various datastores.  Is the precedence being set that datastore specific behaviors may be placed into descriptions?  Is this type of documentation guidance something which explored in draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines?   
(b) Does status mean 'admin-status', 'oper-status' or both?  (I think 'oper-status'.)
(c) should quotes be used around status?

leaf name {,   leaf type { ....
There are NETCONF specific behaviors in the definition of these two leaves.   It would be great to have this transport agnostic.  I realize that such a transport segmentation dissociates transport error handling from the nodes being handled.

leaf admin-status {...
incorrectly marked  as config false;

Thanks,
Eric

> > -----邮件原件-----
> > 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Kent Watsen
> > 发送时间: 2017年11月29日 3:29
> > 收件人: netmod@ietf.org
> > 抄送: netmod-chairs@ietf.org
> > 主题: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00
> >
> > All,
> >
> > This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-netmod-
> rfc7223bis-00.
> >
> > Please recall that this update's intention is to modify the YANG module to
> be in line with the NMDA guidelines [1].  Reviewing the diff between the
> two drafts [2] should reveal just this.
> >
> > The working group last call ends on December 12.
> > Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list.
> >
> > Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is
> ready for publication", are welcome!
> > This is useful and important, even from authors.
> >
> > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01
> > [2]
> > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00.tx
> > t
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Netmod Chairs
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > netmod@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > netmod@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod