Re: [netmod] YANG Versioning Weekly Call Minutes - 2021-06-08

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Mon, 14 June 2021 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <0100017a0b866f67-8f4f2e4e-6c67-41cc-9c7c-b49057826adb-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2123A2B6D for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 10:16:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6VlIEwd9ZBRf for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 10:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a8-96.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-96.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A3763A2B69 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 10:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1623690997; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:Feedback-ID; bh=zeamsk9bOoAFCpAvP+JgHnSIzU7eae/Tfm4LmYCrjwU=; b=eX948kyNCX3DnwYh5te8cDo1UXq1yAxPS6B9WtvmFSdxQfXqGQozuGgNbNtvsq7i Tr81cQr8dYhlV0YNYreBuqpwrzcx6rnUT/r+5dsGOfuK1J8mhh3fEN9VhJ4c/3s8lGv DgNS1mQKzERSuTJTfmm6xh0RTM9sVGZ1Sooj36dA=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHTrZonbrspLUZ1BinLW8M+QEuuAZELReebAxjSkE7iOTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:16:37 +0000
Cc: "Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <jason.sterne@nokia.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <0100017a0b866f67-8f4f2e4e-6c67-41cc-9c7c-b49057826adb-000000@email.amazonses.com>
References: <CABCOCHT86mf2M9Mw4dhOHU2cd4ffkZ4hLd3CfPorG5mk1cUpRQ@mail.gmail.com> <0100017a0a164118-b7e3c4cc-177c-4211-b19a-9dcb77006dcd-000000@email.amazonses.com> <CABCOCHRF=jXR4qJGU5jkv8eVMn3bJfKrWEbE5GU3KfJsuzQMGw@mail.gmail.com> <0100017a0b63209f-789f601b-574a-44c7-b870-ec9bbe870c75-000000@email.amazonses.com> <CABCOCHTrZonbrspLUZ1BinLW8M+QEuuAZELReebAxjSkE7iOTw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2021.06.14-54.240.8.96
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/snKZzoSEdJD6RgoMyyJV9sycVGM>
Subject: Re: [netmod] YANG Versioning Weekly Call Minutes - 2021-06-08
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:16:43 -0000

> I meant the current work is using extensions instead of new language statements.
> Not that the yang-version will never be changed in the future.

Ah, okay.


> It is not a matter of "when" if new functionality is added via extensions.
> In theory the WG could add new functionality to YANG 1.1 this way for years.
> In practice it might be difficult to achieve widespread interoperability if nobody
> agrees what "YANG next"  actually contains. Also, YANG 1.1 clearly says a tool MAY
> skip over and ignore ANY external statement, so it is problematic to use extension-stmt
> as if it was defining real statements. It is better to have a tool clearly fail
> with an "unsupported YANG version" error than it is to silently ignore external statements.

Agreed.


K.