Re: [netmod] A ---- > B

tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Mon, 20 July 2020 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B967E3A08D7 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 02:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=0.5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0tV13KuO4Guu for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 02:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr80095.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.8.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E6A73A0B21 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 02:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ZZ8a77yp2y4Uy7Cl9TsJWyRvXx081BP1mmkS4LIt2frkC9gYRrxmuKapGF0yKlgOke501EfPo8zAvxIQzOhXnleK6Js72oH/w5Fw7hb55bSPxa+f1lQ8/mrCOhOH/RSw17FotIfIyeB7/McF+JoxkLigGDcLJe88e9SSGINJVpf9CBOmp974rHoVkESskrOKxFYCU98j0/DUJUb1cShOpa6hplZKuhC/l7vXVupdVsa37ozZ7zXsc7tyuc7Sr1TUsJ4kYX8H9+iu8D2P2w7hyZYGv3NJ12VncCoGjD9sQKsBDVwUIIL1SlkkggIfYVvJi3XNF6+HNM8B+HH7CQ/L4A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=3FfdglyEyQRKX3NEMEAK16neZnM9VjR+hRI4gl5qUnA=; b=ScncGBGeQ53PWeUFKDm4Lb08QqzalTHGFC1aHedHlotRKecfT+ZVvyjOt9qS2JGcxWcqBuqJE4eJjw5BJ2lkpB2KXwusYD/SspeUtOWCROSDFXh9WtGySh0iVo4PC6M5SivmE3GyPFjGxBUjmpOsqAHLhs5JqVLoaaqQ16TgUHPWP6SSJjUKpFAmYI+eD959pKz49JKmj3P+8kshok8WO99hTy5kecAlqDRIAnW5xeclkDz4yLaREYvxdyG+zCcpUXPimMcJmDI9Pjt8w6Qb+H48bfD7cNM8QYlAmvJ+eqxys8COCyWe9d4t/3tGN2PhfY/eXfc8c96RPelRLn8T4A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=3FfdglyEyQRKX3NEMEAK16neZnM9VjR+hRI4gl5qUnA=; b=EQnn9jNTrzPdhni3W5i/TE/WtK7C1kEvt4NfUQeZT+to5sw5v5j3jRWp1Ddg9l7y7BT0MxnEXkXgArWrkCpIspsya8I+/oR2rPB1DVA5/Xdrxt3AsYBu/KaSb6UTM4WTBlMtNkWinV7hEDnwZKRlnRDoOMi6ksUqrZu7Q/adgQo=
Received: from AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:61::25) by AM6PR07MB5576.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:8b::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3216.14; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:00:08 +0000
Received: from AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6d04:3a51:ec0d:9890]) by AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6d04:3a51:ec0d:9890%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3216.017; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:00:08 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: A ---- > B
Thread-Index: AQHWWr+yDJKeAjqPRE+2NUdFjUV6lakKhRWAgAWtHzo=
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:00:08 +0000
Message-ID: <AM6PR07MB52220315B864245A62ABFDA9A07B0@AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <158859819282.16144.11762511824828734226@ietfa.amsl.com>, <DB7PR07MB45224A311C4FBBAA4A58506CA0A70@DB7PR07MB4522.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <AM6PR07MB52229F16CB108477B3962BEFA07E0@AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>, <MN2PR11MB436630BCDDE3E831DE355E9DB57F0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB436630BCDDE3E831DE355E9DB57F0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cisco.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com;
x-originating-ip: [81.131.229.35]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 924b64a9-5901-45a9-562f-08d82c8b4d56
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM6PR07MB5576:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM6PR07MB5576A3AD1D1C476BC1D8DB1EA07B0@AM6PR07MB5576.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: uRkmVVVUBSIRMftCzQI53utIxqC+LZRWe6F57vikugGXnWhrVAfuHS362qCMwNCJnt4XblL/Yz52NGxfXGaGEeDJUnCNhFjOHjcaQj+8JOiTK4E3rgDGoNkn+aqrKzpIS5HMK0JRDPQCeCVx456sHXyYmu/rFpmZTcYbkVuvC2/g8HN0y4Z5Lq5I0ypqErSIcyznjCYgme3UjlXK+/wBzHAE7M7FY4LJOITH4V+d4s/VbSs3VrX09UEvWwnjo/BNsNWLU7LB2C/iCdhHJ8r9vqu56Uam6oQmZVTlAZR7HITDm8HeiOpqc4/lAyeZQv7p6hgU4IU1FaqDyCUG9Qn8P8N+pKIRD7u6YU430a2Y/JXVFu28qGnZIeQKMw1Ofl7R3kQuV2yKsYFQopIu0iiCYQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(366004)(376002)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(53546011)(71200400001)(86362001)(33656002)(83380400001)(6506007)(8936002)(91956017)(66946007)(316002)(9686003)(52536014)(8676002)(26005)(5660300002)(66476007)(966005)(2906002)(7696005)(478600001)(66556008)(110136005)(64756008)(66446008)(76116006)(55016002)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: kvMKyzXogRL08pW7PYXcIqQ+qbDr6e2hA8P7Bxqeo9ggEHUglQqjoV8Wq+wR6hf06SlhR7Ya0XMgAtfwJtqhCB8G8iM83O2GQwGxK4dJNH6bLI8or2TBaSZa8hsYfP/zWtp6vJssGoYt0Haa4YXIqr7+ZRNpvw+gSnqgQnVHfJIJm4l7TUS7/5jYUJCZI8/QQ8wcxfaN0bvgjsjaXvxU1ywhyr7mG9apuIiDalS9f4NfaXhdcXclyD/ldv8KrCRtbx8nkaFHV4PEcGYpOgFtmfgHfVDA6UQrwj2M96cIZCX29so/6m4EGMhOfECnpuGhvR2/hgssToo12g+d1sI89+A05eevEPLt5/mvIjt/dRkOZwe82qn9umm34/4WdbMYzMHQM8ee3gCGaqzybI28k8q6+kwsocBBplFS9nooT/igoTMLsmV/5dt8lopeOflDwU+QpFOMJdEZABPHpzSbboGEzbEImOqZYSY/INgx9Hc=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM6PR07MB5222.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 924b64a9-5901-45a9-562f-08d82c8b4d56
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Jul 2020 09:00:08.0976 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: GD/0wIU774nBpGUO75BbIdLSS3ZBSzjrfyr6Ejkw5eNSVujaHrFxbiUOoA+UFZaSH9QgP22MeJX6GJO5FtyCoQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM6PR07MB5576
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/6Oqb6PsCyhFAcD70jfES202NTD0>
Subject: Re: [netmod] A ---- > B
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:00:41 -0000

From: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>
Sent: 16 July 2020 19:16
[As an individual]

I would say that the diagram would represent A augments B, since A has a dependency on B.  From a quick search this also appears the direction that a dependency arrow is represented in UML, in case that matters.

<tp>
Yes that is my instinct but it could be that I have been brainwashed by a load of I-D doing it that way and now I have one going the other way I find myself wondering.

Tom Petch

But I could also see how others could see the relationship the other way round.

I agree that doing it consistently is helpful.


Regards,
Rob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of tom petch
> Sent: 15 July 2020 16:51
> To: NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
> Subject: [netmod] A ---- > B
>
> TEAS yang has a mountain of augment and several I-D represent that
> graphically
>
> +-----+          +-----+
> I     I          I     I
> I  A  I   -----> I  B  I
> I     I          I     I
> +-----+          +-----+
> In some I-D this means A augments B
> In other I-D this means B augments A
> I would like consistency.  Is one approach more logical than the other?
>
> Tom Petch
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod