Re: [netmod] IANA modules
Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Wed, 10 April 2019 14:19 UTC
Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F3512012E for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 07:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tPtgGQtjsZst for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 07:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4683120006 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 07:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.61]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32BD91AE0312; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:19:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:19:25 +0200
Message-Id: <20190410.161925.1650103041187977910.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: lhotka@nic.cz
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <2b7e7a35d12f273f8fea55aded8f06987afd37b7.camel@nic.cz>
References: <b0f4f047f70aaea32265ed51ec709855254a2758.camel@nic.cz> <20190410.151506.1911583674051661049.mbj@tail-f.com> <2b7e7a35d12f273f8fea55aded8f06987afd37b7.camel@nic.cz>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/t1Yf89CkS2K7MiPmEsFwa9GSLIU>
Subject: Re: [netmod] IANA modules
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:19:28 -0000
Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> wrote: > Martin Bjorklund píše v St 10. 04. 2019 v 15:15 +0200: > > Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> wrote: > > > Martin Bjorklund píše v St 10. 04. 2019 v 14:26 +0200: > > > > Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > in a discussion in the yang-doctors mailing list, Acee noted that > > > > > IANA probably hasn't yet implemented a procedure for updating YANG > > > > > modules corresponding to IANA registries > > > > > > > > I think that this is a false alarm. IANA updates the modules > > > > according to the process. > > > > > > > > > (such a procedure is > > > > > specified, e.g., in the IANA Considerations section of RFC 7224). It > > > > > indeed seems to be the case - for example, a few new interface types > > > > > have been added recently to > > > > > > > > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaiftype-mib/ianaiftype-mib > > > > > > > > > > but the module iana-if-type only exists in revision 2014-05-08. > > > > > > > > See > > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/yang-parameters.xhtml > > > > > > > > The latest version is iana-if-type@2019-02-08.yang > > > > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/iana-if-type@2019-02-08.yang > > > > > > > > > > > > > A part of the problem may be that there is AFAIK no authoritative > > > > > repository for > > > > > YANG modules where IANA could put the new revisions. > > > > > > > > See > > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters/yang-parameters.xhtml > > > > > > > > This is the authoritative repo. IANA gets new YANG modules directly > > > > from the RFC editor before they are formatted into the ascii RFC. > > > > > > Hmm, but then it is kept pretty secret: > > > > > > - RFC 6020 only specifies the new registry "YANG Module Names" and media > > types > > > in IANA Considerations, not this authoritative module repository. > > > > RFC 6020 defines the registry. IANA maintains the registry. The link > > above is the link to this registry. If you go to iana.org and search > > for "YANG Module Names" this link is the first to be shown. > > According to RFC 6020, it is "a registry for YANG module and submodule names". > Maybe I am ignorant, but I really didn't know that complete modules can also be > retrieved. Also, it seems that only the most recent revision of the iana-* > modules is kept there. Right. So the relevant RFC is really RFC 7224, which defines the initial version of iana-if-type, and the rules for when to update it. Technically, there's a new IANA registry called "iana-if-type YANG Module", which is found here: https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-if-type/iana-if-type.xhtml The fact that you can download the other YANG modules is a bonus ;-) /martin > > > > > > > > - YANG Catalog doesn't know about the recent revisions of iana-if-type. > > > > That's a completely different issue! > > Of course, but it shows that learning about existing modules & revisions (even > the standard ones) isn't particularly easy. > > Lada > > > > > > > /martin > -- > Ladislav Lhotka > Head, CZ.NIC Labs > PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 >
- [netmod] IANA modules Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] IANA modules Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] IANA modules Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] IANA modules Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] IANA modules Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] IANA modules Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] IANA modules tom petch