Re: [netmod] artwork folding: dual support modes?

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Wed, 27 February 2019 06:31 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19336130E2E for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 22:31:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7KMfv60DLujg for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 22:31:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08D9B12F1A6 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 22:31:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.111] (c-73-202-177-209.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.202.177.209]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x1R6VU1h092028; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:31:34 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: nagasaki.bogus.com: Host c-73-202-177-209.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.202.177.209] claimed to be [192.168.0.111]
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Message-Id: <6E24D34F-9943-4A71-9F28-4E4548FF30B0@bogus.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7A68FF8B-EDA3-41E6-9E91-EC40F71B58F9"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 22:31:23 -0800
In-Reply-To: <04b001d4ce22$5bd78d50$1386a7f0$@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, netmod@ietf.org
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
References: <0100016926bfd7ac-333fc4ef-98a8-4dc4-98a2-1b3414b35e24-000000@email.amazonses.com> <04b001d4ce22$5bd78d50$1386a7f0$@olddog.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/t3m6TOrr0M97bkTd5LQREMW3wAs>
Subject: Re: [netmod] artwork folding: dual support modes?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:31:38 -0000


> On Feb 26, 2019, at 14:26, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> Hey.
>  
> I’ve been having this discussion with Kent off-line, but thought it should come to the list.
>  
> I don’t think it is a good idea to have two approaches. While it would be relatively easy to code for both approaches, it seems to add a degree of confusion if both have to be handled by the same code (consider deciding whether leading space characters are to be retained or not, something that can only be decided when the first non-space character is found), or by having different code for the two different cases.
>  
> It doesn’t seem to me that both cases are needed. We can pick one or the other.

A single slash has been used to wrap long lines in editors and shells for decades at this point.

and yeah whatever it is one method seems better than two.

>  
> And *if* we want to allow manual folding so that indents can be made to make the document more human-readable then we have to use a leading ‘\’ on continuation lines to show which spaces should be stripped and which retained.
>  
> Cheers,
> Adrian
>  
> From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Kent Watsen
> Sent: 25 February 2019 22:22
> To: netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: [netmod] artwork folding: dual support modes?
>  
>  
> I had a chat with the tools team recently and, in the course of things, it was implied
> that the double backslash approach we have now was both surprising and non-intuitive. 
>  
> This got me thinking that we may have thrown the proverbial baby out with the bathwater.
> That is, currently we have a header that reads:
>  
>   NOTE: '\\' line wrapping per BCP XX (RFC XXXX)
>  
> So why not *also* support a header that reads (note the singe slash):
>  
>   NOTE: '\' line wrapping per BCP XX (RFC XXXX)
>  
> Whereby this second form only supports the folded line continuing on column 1 (no indents).
>  
> Thoughts?
>  
> Kent // contributor
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod