[netmod] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-16
Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com> Tue, 29 October 2024 09:24 UTC
Return-Path: <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DA1C151996; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 02:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UC1C0rVLZbKK; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 02:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CCA2C151995; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 02:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Xd4TK1vSnz6LDCG; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:19:33 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.172]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFC921400D9; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:24:22 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.219) by frapeml500007.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.172) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 10:24:22 +0100
Received: from frapeml500006.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.219]) by frapeml500006.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.219]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.039; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 10:24:22 +0100
From: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
To: Jürgen Schönwälder <jschoenwaelder@constructor.university>
Thread-Topic: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-16
Thread-Index: AQHbI6Li9Gy+YWVy+k2l0tmYkfcLPLKcYdnQ
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 09:24:22 +0000
Message-ID: <6f7d09d0d8f84767a0c8cf908931a578@huawei.com>
References: <172598125151.2867807.3584395994742506807@dt-datatracker-68b7b78cf9-q8rsp> <ZxYq5nAc96b08DcL@alice.eecs.jacobs-university.de>
In-Reply-To: <ZxYq5nAc96b08DcL@alice.eecs.jacobs-university.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.81.208.21]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: CNVUW6RSUIDRVWKOHWK2CQQXUWEU43WS
X-Message-ID-Hash: CNVUW6RSUIDRVWKOHWK2CQQXUWEU43WS
X-MailFrom: giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netmod.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [netmod] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-16
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/tVTwQ3XIFNrV3tIzDY04wcYQxMg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netmod-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netmod-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netmod-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Jürgen, Thank you for your reply. Your proposed changes look good to me. Regards, Giuseppe -----Original Message----- From: Jürgen Schönwälder <jschoenwaelder@constructor.university> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2024 12:20 PM To: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com> Cc: ops-dir@ietf.org; draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis.all@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org Subject: Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-16 Thanks for the review. I like the proposal to merge the text currently found in the appendix into the introduction (and to also point out that Section 2 provides an overview of all types). I am less sure a detailed discussion why specific types were added is useful. At the end it is the NETMOD working group managing this document. Perhaps I should add a statement like "Additional type definitions may be added in the future by submitting proposals to the NETMOD working group." to clarify that there is a process to propose new types. And this may also serve as a hint that detailed discussions can be found in the working group archives. /js On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 08:14:11AM -0700, Giuseppe Fioccola via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Giuseppe Fioccola > Review result: Has Nits > > This document is clear for its scope. It simply adds new type > definitions to the "ietf-yang-types" and "ietf-inet-types" YANG modules and obsoletes RFC 6991. > > The new types defined in the YANG modules are quite understandable, > but I would suggest to add some explanation, maybe in section 2, about > the motivations behind the addition of these new types (for example, > the new date/time related types compared to the date-and-time type already defined in RFC 6021). > > I noticed that there are two appendixes about the changes from RFC > 6991 and from RFC 6021, which only refer to section 3 and section 4. I > think it is useful to add a reference also to section 2, since the > tables there show the new types with respect to RFC 6991 and RFC 6021. > Additionally, you can consider to move these appendixes as subsections of section 1. > > > -- Jürgen Schönwälder Constructor University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
- [netmod] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ne… Giuseppe Fioccola via Datatracker
- [netmod] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-iet… Jürgen Schönwälder
- [netmod] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-iet… Giuseppe Fioccola