Re: [netmod] intended status of the tree diagram document

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 16 November 2017 23:37 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19531270A0 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 15:37:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u71fgcKp2Csr for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 15:37:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D49712708C for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 15:37:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmgw4 (unknown [10.0.90.85]) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9951E0946 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 16:37:06 -0700 (MST)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id and31w0082SSUrH01nd6rH; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 16:37:06 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=JNNLi4Cb c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=sC3jslCIGhcA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=EHgEyL0dNdGARj3ba7EA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Rtx57k8Yfweqs1mxOV9FjByS31g2Q+gvEmONbMBEgh0=; b=ghR7dA53+OFcj1nOTAKLnFdro+ d3QVGmq5LQQFS6vst8O+FlqxAYuiNGBxbm/z8sM6e8NMa2uItMC+lVK5mpTmlKgvFlnYVcFDP18Q8 7iThLGLMqV5IilrJ8Qyv8Sx3E;
Received: from pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.86.101]:59302 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1eFTiQ-002YlW-ND; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 16:37:03 -0700
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, netmod@ietf.org
References: <20171115.135818.591114714397486064.mbj@tail-f.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <69960a0c-1441-ec80-d8fb-287d8c474300@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 07:36:58 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171115.135818.591114714397486064.mbj@tail-f.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.86.101
X-Exim-ID: 1eFTiQ-002YlW-ND
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.86.101]:59302
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 9
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/tbaxxFyJSI6yc7_9AbLv4HNoeqU>
Subject: Re: [netmod] intended status of the tree diagram document
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 23:37:11 -0000

Martin,
	I think you are correct.  We should leave as is.

I'm sure Kent/the document Shepherd makes sure whatever we do is right 
before publication in any case.

Lou (as contributor)

On 11/15/2017 8:58 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Currently, draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams has intended status
> Standards Track.  I think I heard during the meeting today that it
> ought to be Informational.  I think this makes sense.  It would then
> imply that other standards track documents will have the tree diagram
> document as an informative reference.
> 
> Should we make this change?
> 
> 
> /martin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>