IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-01: an optional location info

Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz> Thu, 11 July 2019 13:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CE5120044 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 06:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cesnet.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C0WF_bdK9Gmj for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 06:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from office2.cesnet.cz (office2.cesnet.cz [195.113.144.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEC2512002F for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 06:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (2a01cb0580a402006114d55734de27b2.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr [IPv6:2a01:cb05:80a4:200:6114:d557:34de:27b2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by office2.cesnet.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CC60400068; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 15:54:57 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cesnet.cz; s=office2; t=1562853303; bh=Aii9AskkBx8y9xXWU0g5qB5auGh6cjxEtJZCF5tHbCA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=hxGfThfxqE3wnzt2JDT7XwC/Pa4DwLrxiNnOJR81iyWHJOwCbuHIQKQV9lw8Y44VB nh6nviY/cAn3D6c/c3zHS6kvIi9uaYGu6HGXnR/5qMX5TgligcJYlUPcv9OqTLEKXE XMJ23nVpFcTfH5j2i2SGcAl+xTF702KKHyQ7ch50=
From: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 15:54:50 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8daa922c-194c-4a1f-9a4e-b2851ef58ed3@cesnet.cz>
In-Reply-To: <87lfx4df50.fsf@nic.cz>
References: <8bcdad12-cec1-47b2-b8ad-bb8ab6d6783e@cesnet.cz> <87lfx4df50.fsf@nic.cz>
Organization: CESNET
User-Agent: Trojita/v0.7-402-g90b417b1-dirty; Qt/5.13.0; xcb; Linux; Gentoo Base System release 2.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/uYDWaiCFMnMVPyp12-qyf4JTzPY>
Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-01: an optional location info
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:55:13 -0000

> The "location" choice is defined as mandatory, so an instance 
> of one of the cases must be present. I don't know whether it is 
> necessary or not, but you can avoid it easily by overriding the 
> definition:

Thanks for explaining this. I'll leave it to the draft authors to evaluate 
whether an optional geolocation makes more sense than a hard-coded one.

Diky
Honza K.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email