IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netmod] <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-foo@2016-03-20.yang" or <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-foo.yang"

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 23 March 2017 23:33 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38891293E3 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QpPg5JicZZ1C for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99E4129511 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=425; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1490312001; x=1491521601; h=to:cc:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=e2KAzJ1OPCuGFuMToLILlLfv5B+HLNc/U2h9mduiT7Y=; b=L6UBwFE5WYgnX29mjcFyQXfSpvGIDVzHyAQ1rMnev5VzyVuz7ZNsWlIG Zp2UeeouPLjwFMNhxBKS95yyWoVFsu6b+T5Iyqmj9G7qFhVC1geEyvI3n J+5gi9YS2W5OCPyAAlVO8DF2sUlNN15Fu9TAHwrDojSEFPW41r69+4A0v I=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,212,1486425600"; d="scan'208";a="653482591"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Mar 2017 23:33:19 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.87] (ams-bclaise-8916.cisco.com [10.60.67.87]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2NNXJki022580; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 23:33:19 GMT
To: NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
Cc: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <02834066-3540-790e-bdda-abc5d90bfdac@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:33:20 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/v1OHqf2r1t5rWhhGWTlT3JYAoJE>
Subject: [netmod] <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-foo@2016-03-20.yang" or <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-foo.yang"
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 23:33:24 -0000

Dear all,

[Preparing the IETF hackathon]

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis#section-4.2
What is the guideline regarding:
     <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-foo@2016-03-20.yang"
     versus
     <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-foo.yang"

Right now, we have a mix of behaviors.
This implies that the extracted YANG modules sometimes contains the 
revision, but not always.

Regards, Benoit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email